Budget sedans in Russia are of great popularity. Interest in this type of body is difficult to explain rationally, but it is not necessary to world automakers: they simply react to the needs of the masses. Therefore, the choice as applicants for the purchase of these models is not accidental. But if Polo is known to our car enthusiasts very well, then you can't tell this about the American. Does this mean that he is not enough to choose? We will try to find out in our small comparative review.
Features of models
Back in 2015, the GM autoconecern announced the updated version of the Cruze sedan, which became the second generation. Initially, the model was developed for local and Chinese automotive markets, and in the subway, the car appeared even earlier. From the sedan of the previous generation, the novelty is distinguished by increased dimensions and more aggressive and rapid appearance, but Cruze weight even decreased slightly.
As for the updated Polo, intended for the Russian market initially, there is also enough changes here, but they are not global. It can be noted more than the pumproom space and the cabin. The battery has become more powerful as the starter that for Russian winters is a nice little thing. In a compartment with an increased diameter of the starting system, these measures allowed us to ensure trouble-free motor start at temperatures up to minus 35 degrees. In the database, heating steering and seats appeared.
Appearance
Although the second generation of Chevrolet Cruze is produced in three bodies, we naturally interest exclusively sedan. Immediately, we note that his appearance looks very solid and modern, but without new-fashioned harsh broken lines - they are not to face sedan.
The front bumper has become significantly more, in the middle there is a radiator grille of a new form, separated by half a narrow strip with a characteristic golden cross in the middle. The holes in the lattice became less, but it only improved the perception of the car. Front optics, according to the current automotive mod, stretched in length and partially enters the wings. In the lower part of the bumper, an uninformed air intake is located, and in the edges - large niches with small fogs.
The sidewall ceased to be absolutely smooth, but the relief is poorly expressed, it is not visible at all with some angles. The trunk door decreased in size, and now the stap lights moved to it. The form of the rear optics is far from the right outlines and therefore it looks interesting. The massive rear bumper does not have any bright details, but it definitely gives the appearance of a sedan greater aggressiveness. The exhaust pipe is not visible at all - it is hidden in the bottom.
The German sedan looks good too. But as for aesthetics, this is not the component that is the strong side of the polo. Compared to Chevrolet, the German looks a little outdated, and this "a little" affects the time interval for a decade.
Nevertheless, the car is perceived very positively, largely due to carefully calculated lines and proportions. Do not forget that the conservative approach to the exterior is peculiar to this German autocontrace, which bets on other advantages. However, the POLO body still has parts dictated by the current fashion: it is primarily to fire on the doors and the hood. But it should be recognized that they are so naturally fit into the existing image that they don't even notice them.
So, by the POLO exterior, the sedan is not a competitor Chevrolet Cruze, which does not prevent him from selling well.
Interior
It cannot be said that the changes made in the second generation of the sedan were strongly influenced on the internally decoration. Shared features with the predecessor are preserved. Ergonomics grew, but this is an evolutionary process. What do we have inside? The massive central futuristic console is noteworthy. It is not the largest display of the multimedia system (seven or eight inches), below are the controls of the climate control system controlled by keys or washers.
The steering wheel of Cruze is a multifunctional, three-spin, not closing a tidy review, which also looks stylish with a small (4.2 inches) display in the center.
The conveniences of the front armchairs are no doubt, they have an anatomical profile and pronounced lateral support, as well as adjustments in three planes. In senior grades, there is heating and even the driver's back massage feature.
Since the sizes of the sedan rose, it is fairly free on the back row, especially in the field of the legs. In the class with Chevrolet Cruze, one of the leaders is one of the leaders.
The salon is decorated with textiles and skin, and the latter can change the shape, adjusting to the anatomical features of the seds.
The volume of the Americans's trunk is 450 liters, which is a good indicator.
Salon Polo, as well as its appearance, conservative. Here, German origin is felt literally in everything, especially in part of ergonomics. All controls are located where and must be, everyone is available, there is a sufficient number of niches and pockets, the instrument panel is very simple and informative, easily readable and interpreted.
The driver's seat is also regulated in three planes and six directions, but the adjustment of the back position is not provided. But this is compensated by an anatomy front back profile. Side support is available, but it is not well pronounced, the chairs themselves are rigid, that with a crowded seat even better than soft seats with a vague profile.
The steering column is also adjustable in all possible directions, under any settings, without limiting the visor visibility.
The only minus that can hardly be corrected - the insufficient height of the cabin. In the width of the space from behind, enough for three average passengers, but the average of them will have no place to be given legs - there is a high central tunnel.
The verdict is an exemplary parity with a slight deviation in the direction of Cruze - it is modern and more interesting.
Engines and transmissions
The second generation of Chevrolet Cruze has already gained fame and popularity in many global markets. Despite belonging to the golf class, the sedan is moderated compact and economical. Basic is a 1.4-liter turbocharged power unit with a capacity of 153 liters. with. It works in a pair with a six-speed MCPP, but an option with a machine gun is more economical. A more variable 1.6-liter develops only 137 horsepower and can be aggregated with mechanics and a nineidia band machine.
POLO engines have three:
- 1.6-liter, with a capacity of 90/10 "horses" depending on the forcing, with peak km 155 nm at 3800-4000 turns / minute;
- 1,4-liter turbocharged 125-strong analogue (200 nm at 1500-4000 revolutions / minutes).
The 90-strong motor works in a pair with manual transmission. All other can be equipped with both mechanical and automatic transmission.
By power of power units Comparison Chevrolet Cruze and Volkswagen Polo - in favor of the American, despite the poorer line of power units.
Dynamics, fuel consumption
Chevrolet Cruze with a turbocharged motor and a manual box is gaining a hundred per 8.1 second. In this combination, gasoline consumption is as follows: around the city - 8.3 liters per 100 km, on the highway - 6.0 liters, on average, 7.3 liters. With a box, an overclocking indicators worsen up to 8.6 seconds, and economy increases (in a mixed cycle - 6.09 liters)
The 1.6-liter turbodiesel is not as dynamic - 9.3 seconds, but consumes less fuel - only 6.4 liters in the mixed mode of movement with a mechanical transmission. The same consumption and version with automatic transmission.
Volkswagen Polo markedly loses in dynamics: a 90-strong engine with a mechanical gearbox takes 11.2 seconds for a speed set of up to 100 km / h. The 110-strong motor with MCPP does this in 10.4 seconds, with automatic transmission - in 11.7 seconds. And only the turbocharged unit overcame the iconic mark - 9.0 seconds.
But the level of gasoline flow is less:
- 90-strong 1.6-liter motor - 4.5 liters on the highway and 7.7 liters in the urban cycle;
- The 110-strong unit of the same volume is 4.6 liters with mechanics and 4.7 liters with automatic transmission on the highway and 7.8 / 7.9 liters. respectively in urban mode;
- turbated engine: 4.7 liters with MCPP and 4.8 with automatic transmission on the highway, 7.5 / 7.3 liters, respectively in the city.
Make conclusions yourself.
Controllability
Since the motors have Cruze powerful, the sedan is accelerated pretty quickly, even being equipped with an automatic box. The width of the torque is impressive, so even at low speeds of problems with a set of speed.
Setting the sedan chassis can be called successful at least a balance between comfort and handling here is very good. The steering wheel is informative and responsive, on high-speed turns of rolls, but they are minimal. The energy consumption of the suspension is not the largest, but shook only at small speeds and on roads with small defects. Large bumps suspension swallows almost completely.
The POLO suspension is initially adapted for domestic roads. Therefore, minor average irregularities are absorbed quite effectively, the vibration steering wheel is not transmitted. But the "break" the suspension is not so difficult, and from the point of view of acoustics such an event will be accompanied by a decent sound on the amplitude. And in general, the suspension works not too quietly - it is heard even on small irregularities. This is not surprising - she is moderately tough, although the energy intensive.
In high-speed turns, the car behaves interestingly - until a certain moment, the roll is present, but within the norm for this class, but when the speed or angle of rotation grows to a critical level, the angle of inclination of the body, using the entire resource of the suspension, remains at the same level. You need to get used to such behavior.
Comparing Chevrolet Cruze and Volkswagen Polo by driving qualities, it can be concluded that cars are approximately equal, although POLO has settings for bad roads.
Security
The new Cruze is equipped with a large set of modern, whose work is aimed at reducing the risk of critical situations. We are talking about the systems of control of robes, about the assistants who follow the movement of the car in difficult weather conditions. It is equipped with an American sedan and functional safety pillows, made up the latest automotive technologies.
Volkswagen Polo has only ESP system, everything else is passive Sat: two frontal pillows, attachments for children's seats, etc.
Configuration and prices
The basic modification of the LS, standing in the version with a 109-strong engine and manual transmission 790 thousand rubles, is equipped with the following options: an assistant movement to the mountain, six airbags, a parking sensor with a rear camera, climate control, cruise control, an electric car.
Equipment Lt worth from 860 thousand rubles is additionally equipped with a more modern multimedia system, a large number of parking sensors / sensors, two-zone climate control.
The LTZ top pack is worth 1.03 million rubles and has an extended list of options: leather cabin, lots of assistants and security systems, push-button start of the engine, a modern musical system with nine columns and a subwoofer, bi-xenon head optics, an electric hatch.
As an option, you can equip the car with splitter, threshold overlays, another radiator grille and spoiler on the trunk.
POLO Basova is a modification of a conceptline worth 670 thousand rubles, equipped with a 1,6-liter power unit and a five-speed manual transmission. The set of options includes: ABS system, front PB, daytime running lights, Cz.
Trendline equipment costs from 750 thousand, but here you can choose a more powerful motor and an automatic box. Here, air conditioning and 15-inch discs are added to the previous options.
The top-end version of the ComfortLine will cost you 805-890 thousand rubles, and for this money you will have a leather steering wheel, heated windshield washer, heated driver's / front passenger chairs.
Which sedan is better
If you carefully read this material, especially the section about the configuration, then probably your output will be unequivocal that Chevrolet Cruze is better than Volkswagen Polo almost all indicators. But why then the German is selling like a hot patty, and an American - no? First, POLO sales peak remained in the past. Today's buyer of three hundred times he recalculates everything and recovers before making the final choice, and increasingly it is not done in favor of Polo, because every year competition is becoming more and more fierce. Budget innovations appear increasingly, and Cruze is one of them.
Secondly, the fame factor has a great power of inertia. Volkswagen Polo - brand promoted, unlike Chevrolet Cruze, the second generation of which only recently appeared. And if you ask the autodiets themselves, you will get a completely different assessment - Cruze's popularity is growing, and POLO is reduced. Most likely, this trend will continue in the next few years - the American looks too tempting, which has a top modification equipped with almost an order of magnitude better. However, it is possible that in a few years a new bestseller will appear on the market - the situation of recent years has such conclusions. In the meantime, we can definitely say: Although Chevrolet Cruze and Volkswagen Polo are approximately the same, these are completely different cars, and the leadership of the American looks indisputable.
We are a young family with a child! And this is my third car. The car bought the car is not knowing that we are waiting for the replenishment and famously chased through the highways. Before that, we had a Chevrolet Cruze - an incredible handsome man, and now a classic German.
First about the basic characteristics of our car.
- In operation now cars, 1.6 l with a six-speed gearbox. Box automaton, which I think optimal for the city. The car rides very quickly, on the track on overtaking goes quickly, switches the transmission on time, there is a tiptronic to be turned on before overtaking to reduced transmission. In the city, it is used to lift up the mountain at slow speed. The same task is performed by the SHIFT DOWN feature (gas pedal to floor), that is, it includes a reduced and forward!
- The appearance is classic and has not changed for a long time, that is, there are some guarantees that this car simply won't get out of fashion. For example, Hyundai Solaris is infinitely changing the exterior. The headlights shine well, albeit halogen. Dual light is excellent.
- The price of the car in the middle price range from 550 tr. Our max .computer came out at 700 tr. There is climate control, heated seats, all windows, leather multifunction .Rul, leather lever, music from USB, PTF, Bluetooth, and so on I will describe.
- The trunk was very compatible: the stroller climbs without problems, things from the garden and the resulting crop is fully placed. 460 liters as a man.
- Passenger places are comfortable, threesome sit comfortable. There are handles to stay with passengers and hooks to transport a suit on a hanger. The interimer I really like it, and the difference from the old polo. A red-white dial, on-board computer with a clear menu.
- The steering wheel lies in the hands, it is convenient, the capture is correct. There is an adjustment of departure and height. There are cupchers, a spacious glove box with a hidden bottom, mirrors in a visor for the driver and passenger.
- Seats very quickly warm up, heating two-zone-buttocks and loins. Not frozen anything, warming up per minute. Addiction is adjustable in height and departure.
- We have a "winter package" installed, that is, there is heating of the front mirror, rear-view mirrors, winter tires with cast discs. Very comfortable in winter, do not need to scribe glass. And so brushed the snowball and went. The car is heated in 6-8 minutes of the desired `S.Ya Snowball, the bags are cutting, music and Bluetooth include and go. Drive talking through Bluetooth.☝
- Handling suits me in spring / autumn on a wet road, as well as in winter it is worthily going through the snow. Creaters 17 cm. For the sedan, it was good as the tens, and she generally passed like a tank))) Music pleased. Gromko sounds perfectly, there are no strange outsiders .✊odynaya here is a nuance-shumka bad. The larger is heard. But the music decides everything, you understood me)))
- I like the firmware of the computer built-in, you can flip songs to scroll, save already 16 radio stations and connect up to three telephone to work with Bluetooth, you can listen to music through it. I can combine the music in many variations, the air conditioner copes with your work, removes frightened and fogging.
- Overview The car is good, there is a light factory tint.
Machine is cool. There are money for sure, the workhorse. Power. All that is in it, thought out and made high quality and with love. It is easy to keep clean, the upholstery is good. ✌
Now comparing two cars with each other.
- 1,4L engine with a 4-speed gearbox in Chevrolet was not comparing with a comparison with 1.6 L polo Sedan with a 6-speed gearbox. Details in addition to the obvious characteristic difference, there is also a difference in car vehicle. Cruze is very heavy The car and for her just needed 1.6 / 1.8 / 2.0l and a six-step. He also saved the tiptronic.
- Chevrolet Machine is just incredible beauty -mills and daring. And the car POLO-Classic is not cool. But the classic does not come out of fashion, and the design has not changed for a long time, so there is some kind of probability that will remain and will not come out of fashion. Unlike Hyundai Solaris, who changed the exterior every year. If you look not for practicality, I won Cruze, because I love "evil muffles" in cars)))
- Shumka is the same, not very good.
- The clearance of POLO -17 cm and this is a high value for a sedan, and the framed 16.5 cm declared, but they cannot be about them. Since the front "skirt" grows several cm and the car becomes just impassable. Confident VW Polo victory. Therefore, we changed the car.
- B Interior VW Polo Spokone Ootenki-Red and White Scoreboard Scoreboard, and Chevrolet inside the Blue Illumination and the Central Console as in the spacecraft. Both options, however, with a small pass, Cruze wins, also for my favorite youth design.
I summarize: two luxury cars, with interesting design and good characteristics. Each one: choose between POLO practicality and a bright appearance of Cruze.
Here, after a long time I decided to unsubscribe. Background: I thought the throttle knot, then to the sensors, it turned out to be in the ignition module, in the process of the cruiser of the weden of the flywheel, randomly brings the housing of the CATER CTP in the starter area and so \u003d) for a long time he did not decrease to write that . Of course, I am not the first with whom this could happen at the most appropriate moment. But in my case it was an option to change the position at work and life forced the events! Now I'm waiting for a child and a wedding day, with which you can congratulate me.
So for repairing money will not be soon, everything is on the preparation and credit for the car! Due to hopelessness of the situation, the pit was not finished, of course, it is not over, but in full growth (170) you can stand, slightly crowding your head, under the car. The car from home was drawn on the cable, but she did not want to start the option was 2 ignition module, fuel. In this (2) time, we were able to shove the car in spite of the rain, with the help of neighbors.
The pit seemed slightly inconvenient, or rather short for my car, I had to remember Cleanings with a machine gun under obstacles. Put the back, and was glad that the suspension was not understated \u003d) the starter was removed long ago. He took off the protection of the crankcase (some round gums left, who knows where to shove? Unscrew the thrust from the gearbox (do not believe if somewhere you read what you need to put the rear speed and then unscrew the nuts from the wheels. I also tried the wheels Equally spin \u003d)) the only thing you need is to mark the strip where there was a connection with a pinch with a straight screwdriver on the nanile dirt. Unscrew the bottom cover of the clutch crankcase.
The wheels are not a problem, but the nuts will be remembered for a long time! The nuts are specifically bent so that they themselves are not unscrewed. There was no suitable chisel in the garage, and a screwdriver and a chisel went to the move (the kingdom of heavenly). Something coped to the existing tool, but in the future I fell a little chisel \u003d) before further procedure requires a 2nd person, but can take it?! \u003d) I decided to insert the shaped keys from furniture in the disks of the DC. Next, it was necessary to find the head for 30! On the way to the store wandered home and found a suitcase testing (future). I took from there (as I was then seemed to) a more convenient goroton. Long handle at the end of the cardan. But in the process he seemed fragile.
In the Internet, also faced the fragility of keys into the process of unscrewing such nuts. There were advice to buy a balcony key from Gazelle or Zila. In the morning I decided that if another key would not help, then in the planned trip, for the army bakers home, buy a new key. He took the usual knot (on the piece of iron slides fastening the head). Fortunately, he was stronger, but how I did not jump on it (even the sole on the right boot took it away! Nothing turned out.
He also aggravated the steering wheel, which was easily rotated along with the drives and was hard to control. Thus, the key constantly tried to scratch the wing Nut did not succumb. I found some kind of tube cm 15-20 so that in it to combine the end of the key and scrap, but it only swept it \u003d). Accidentally pushed one of the neighbors and, fortunately, it turned out to be a tap pipe. That's what helped me! He asked the same test on the phone (on the heart).
I went shopping. Immediately I drove home behind shoes, my father's home almost convinced that the filler was needed for removing the flywheel. Next to the house went into the fasteners of the nuts turned out to be 30r, I decided to postpone the purchase to the market. On Antoshka walked first to shop.
The very first seller rushed for a long time in search of a puller for the flywheel VAZ 2110, and asked for help from colleagues. A little later, they realized that he was not needed there \u003d) I decided to acquire just in case a puller for the ball t. K. according to plan to remove drives! (As it turned out, the finger is not needed to remove). What they just did not offer on the market. Some soldier, (which turned out to be for the classics) in one place 100 rubles.
But he did not find the seller, sent 250 to his neighbors, seek a bolt in a long nut \u003d), in another place I was explained that I don't need it. The appropriate puller for the ball turned out to be 100 rubles cheaper than others (250 rubles they are also scored from the steering). In the market, the nuts were at the same price as in the store here and bought. The next day it was necessary to remove the drives of the front wheels there 2 bolts on each side. (Only then I learned that you do not need to unscrew from my finger \u003d)).
Then lining all sorts of wooden bars. Metal blade pulled out drives from the box. Unscrew the work box was not (3 bolts and 1 nut with a stud, which seemed to be in a box, but still found). Completely to shoot it alone! After unscrewing, the boards and jack on them were put under the car.
Slightly subdomains with all the attempts to pull it out something prevented. And then I remembered about some kind of left support that seemed right for me. Wheel side and 1a under the clutch cable fastening. I chose the first. Further the edge of the box brought above the ball as much as the dropping jack lowered the box on the board.
Know! An oil that flows from the shelves of the drives during the removal is left in the muffin box. When removing the basket, again collided with the problem of free rotation. But her strength to overcome only the next day. Slightly tapping the hammer on the old wreath, he does not shift tears from the flywheel (without any chisel and drills to which some resorted!). On the same day, the circumstances successfully developed in half an hour before the arrival threw the flywheel in the freezer. And went to wash in the shower.
After the shower (min 20), everything quickly combined. The next day I decided to install the flywheel and disassemble the box to separate the part that was brushed, so it would be easier to transport. But nothing worked out the neighbor proposed waiting for his friend who said that it was necessary to unwind the gearbox. There will have to unscrew the tight nuts tightly, and you need to do it together.
He finally convinced me to unwind me too much \u003d) Taking advantage of the case tried to bring the box by car to the nearest service with argon. According to the advice of a friend of the neighbor, there was a pensioner who cooks well, but I met there an inadequate reaction from the workers. Everyone did not care and it was said to be said that they were not engaged in argon (probably they thought it was necessary to shoot the box and it broke them out) After a little perseverance, one master fell silent with some kind of grandfather and finally said that there were no welds. Riding around the district, in the garages I brought an advertisement by a canister. On this day it did not work out and the garage was closed. The next day, removing the money began to double-check the recorded number, got through, replaced 100r / 1cm.
T. K. The car has already been absent. I decided to bring the box on the trolley \u003d). While the time was leaked gasoline from the filter to rinse the place of welding and shard.
At the appointed time, I installed the MCPP in the cart, turned on the 1st speed \u003d) and on the gases! On the same day, before work, the welding finish did not have time because of the lack of the 2nd person (Zabukhal after the holiday). On the second day I took my miracle on the same carte \u003d) This day was after the night shift, so it took everything in the garage and finished it. (For example, there were about 10, but I said that there is no more than 600r and it will not be) Cooked more from the inside, outside only in the area where the starter does not concern. The next day, immediately after work, I went to Anthoshka. The goal was to find a centering mandrel for clutch, liquid for cleaning carburetors (clean the box), and a boot for a fork.
Walking around the entire Antoshka was not there any mandrels! (Someone made a remark yes who fuck they need? Now the clutch is complete with mandrels go!) I bought the cheapest cleaner carburetors 100r,. (Automaster like), 50 was asked for a boot. It went shopping, there I found a boot for 35, on one mandrel for 50 and for 150. Slightly doubting in the proportions that they should represent from themselves, went home on the road to fasteners. Similar proportions were in an option for 150 rubles (3 levels), but in the fastener for 150 sold the same as for 50 rubles (2 levels). It was decided to return to the first store and take for 50 rubles.
Only the edge was 15-17 and not 20. Later in the garage, the mandrel was tested and it turned out to be enough. Split a basket with clutch. I started cleaning the box from Nagar and and dirt nagwesch on oil drips.
I did not like the cleaner. ABRO was used in front of him, he has a pressure of 2 times more, it is not necessary to rub everything that all fell off almost itself. (I bought it once for 220 fasteners the same 140r) but still cleaned it not bad. Gram 300 left! \u003d) Next time I decided to establish a box, even called a neighbor who proved his candidacy. Only he didn't get anything, grabbed the gentle of the oil level to tighten the box, then it was wondering that his wife waits for her to go.
Realizing almost a hopeless position decided to strain and something invented something. At first threw the box under the car on the 1st tree. Then, somehow threw the left edge on the ball, the wooden bar was substituted under the right.
Put another rustling of a little left and put a jack on it. Rimming the jack left edge tried further and continue to stick the edge into the ball, rearring the bar before the breathing transfer \u003d). Finally, the left edge was nowhere to move, but the place appeared to rearrange the jack closer to the right. Rimming the jack managed to hook the box for the left support! It has almost meant victory. Further attempts to combine the engine did not succeed until I decided to substitute the 2nd area under the engine and lift it with a 2M jack. After it was convinced that both jacks stand tightly, unscrewed the support and began to weaken the 1st jack.
After the edge of the stiletto box appeared on a couple of centimeters, I immediately planted the nut on him and tried to pull it out. I did not pull up the other bolts yet. Only then screwed back the left support and pulled the box. In the place of the welding there was a slight deepening under the starter, there I decided to smell a sealant. The next time I had to kill the whole day to install the drives! They inspired me on exactly with nuts \u003d) 3 rubles acquired stop rings as it was written in the manual.
All dancing with a tambourine and math chants to remember difficult after exiting trance \u003d) the right-hand drive to stick into the box as much as it enters, the second edge stick into the disk and fasten to the ball. Then by making the Wooden bar in size by the chisel, drove them with a hammer on it through the nut the drive in the box (the locking ring should go deeper and stall) with the left-hand drive, only one bolt is only screwed. After the hammer, you can also twist. After that, we twist the ill-fated nuts and bend in the slots. After the assembly, I poured a fusion oil t.
K. There is no money for a new money. On the photo of the bottle with a hose of the blog post was not enough \u003d) I tried to start. The starter twists, but the engine does not grab, from this I made conclusions of gasoline or MW (otreazhazh). So the main goal for replacing the crown and welding of the box is made. Running forward. I will say that the bay of gasoline did not start the machine \u003d (on the module, a dropped wire was detected.
In the future, on the sorcerer above the MH, the money will not appear, and there either buy a MH either I will make God's spark (for money the same thing) article from the site: http://www.drive2.ru.
Comrades Cruzoda, I suffer in choosing a car ...
He stopped on two models, it was Chevrolet Cruise and Polo Sedan in the maximum speed ... It is clear that in the Cruz group everyone will advise Cruise, and in the Polo group will advise polo, but I want you to give objective estimates of these two cars!
Why exactly they? The appearance of itself, but the polo attracts greater efficiency in both maintenance and gasoline. Cruz like both externally and internally, and the class is higher, but scares the high fuel consumption (I plan 1.8 engine). There are kosyachki on all cars, and even for a million and higher, I just want to pick up optimal for yourself!
Share your impressions, especially those who have long ride on Cruz, what is the flow? How many on the tank pass (1, 8 mt)? What shoals got out? Should I take for long exploitation? Machines change often no opportunity! Therefore, I plan to take for 5 years ...
IKA (Jesenia) Machine went on the 4th year, there are no complaints! In addition to consumables, nothing has changed, even the timing was changed for the 90t. TF in TFU TFU .. Rouge 91000t Dvig. 1.6 Full tank at 450km, which is very frustrating. The rest is very pleased with its choice.
Vadim (Jerrilinn) is how you need to ride what a full tank is 450? I have a cruise 1.8 140l on the mechanics of the floor of the tank pour on 1000r shows 360 strokes. This is noted that winter and a new non-rolling machine.
Andrey (Jatin) Solaris Take, you will not regret, well, or Cruz, polo do not try, the goven is notable!
Yaroslav (Jilyen) Polo sedan except in Russia will not meet anywhere, they are sold and created exclusively for Russia. So it can be called the underfolts. The maximum speed is expensive for this class. Cruise in its class one of the most affordable. The maximum speed will be better equipped. If the money will allow Take 1, 4 turbo, 140 mares. Consumption is less than 1, 8, the thrust is better. He himself wrote that Cruise above the class, which means spacious inside. Both outside and inside the cruise looks better, solid. The volume of the trunk in the car is approximately the same. Gasoline consumption depends on how the running was passed and on which refueling is refueling. Having traveled to the Polo. We will definitely want auto class above, and most likely compensation as a result of a class C, so it's not better to ride immediately on the car from the class. Choosing between these cars I advise Cruz. Polo is worth compared if with Chevrolet, then with cobalt. I go to Aveo myself.
Roman (Suprasanna) Yaroslav, are now discounts, here you can 1, 8 Mt for 620 thousand grab in the LT picking, polo with a premium package is also not enough for a turbo .. ((Yes, and maintain it more expensive .. and polo sedan is sold in India and developing countries, as well as cobalt, globalization makes its business
Yury (ILANKA) Yes, nakov wove you with this polo. Machines Different. The service of the polo is equal to the maintenance of Jetty. You need to buy from my head. Even the thought of buying this folts. http://auto-dealer.ru/articles/rating/? id \u003d 48539.
IKA (Jesenia) Vadim, the fact that 1.6 consumption is slightly more than 1.8. Yes, and it was said about the urban cycle, the traffic jams. On the highway is of course much less. Nothing surprisingly here
Yes, and crawl on your 1.6 I can't have to enhance
As soon as I roll 450kg from the full tank, it remains in the tank of the Litorv 6-7-8
Pavel (Amaranta) arrived only from Belarus, back and back and there, Mileage 3400 km, flow 7, 5 l / 100km at a speed of 90-100 km / h (the road was not ah), back consumption 7, 3 l / 100 km, average consumption for all time tracks 7, 7 l / 100 km. In St. Petersburg, the place is always somewhere 9, 8 l / 100 km mixed. Dvig. 1, 8 mt Cruz. Mileage 52000 km, almost 2 years. There are practically no complaints yet, I am satisfied.
Tags: What is better than Chevrolet Cruise or Volkswagen Polo SedanVW Polo Sedan VS Chevrolet Cruze. New tire center Vianor. Repair: Give it to see! Driving school: Dangerous ...
AVTUTERS Ecocating Arigon (Perm, Saratov) | Topic Topics: Ndale
Installation of autopilot covers on Chevrolet Cruze
VW POLosedan Highline (Polo Sedan) VS Chevrolet Cruze (Chevrolet ...
21 Jun. 2010 - Re: Polo Sedan Highline or Chevrolet Cruise Cruz looks very impressive. Although I read the reviews, it is not better at all, but in many ...
Comparison Chevrolet Cruze (2009-2012) 1.6 and Volkswagen Polo ...
Comparison Chevrolet Cruze (2009-2012) 1.6 and Volkswagen Polo Sedan (2010-2015) 1.6 (105 hp)
Chevrolet Cruz successfully ranked its market share. It is a modern, reliable car with athletic mothers. Despite this, there are a number of competitive machines. They have both advantages against the background of Chevrolet Cruze and disadvantages. As a result, in the automotive market there is constantly struggle between various machines trying to attract the attention of buyers.
Chevrolet comparison Cruise and Ford Focus
Chevrolet Cruz has a number of advantages over Ford Focus. Conducting a comparison, the main of the advantages can be allocated:
- a more convenient steering wheel, especially compared to Ford Focus 3;
- good review from the driver's seat;
- the perfect design of the steering rack, which cannot boast Ford Focus 2.
Decide which car is better than Ford Focus or Chevrolet Cruze, the choice towards the first is possible for the following reasons:
- good suspension;
- high-quality material of the cabin;
- effective noise insulation.
Cars are in one price category. Their cost ranges from 800,000 to 1,200,000 rubles. 
Chevrolet Cruze or Opel Astra
According to the reviews of car owners, Opel Astra is prone to breakage of the crankshaft sensor. With its malfunction, the engine becomes completely inoperable. A meter is installed on the billet of the oil pump housing. It creates a synchronization pulse thanks to which the controller determines the position and frequency of rotation of the crankshaft. According to this data, calculates the moment of operation of the nozzles and the ignition module Repair is possible only to replace the sensor. Chevrolet Cruz is somewhat reliable in this regard. The cost of Opel Astra is under the same limits as Cruze similar configuration.
Cruise against Toyota Corolla
Operation Toyota Corolla will allow you to identify the following features:
- many childhood diseases;
- the presence of crickets in the cabin;
- high engine sensitivity to fuel and oil quality;
- soft suspension;
- the cost is higher than the Chevrolet Cruz, and ranges from 1.2 to 1.5 million rubles;
- sufficient comfort.
Cruze or Skoda Octavia
Comparing the car Skoda Octavia and Chevrolet Cruz is given in the table below.
Chevrolet comparison Cruise and Volkswagen Polo
It is determined that the Volkswagen polo or Cruz can be better at the following advantages and disadvantages of the German:
- lack of "childhood diseases";
- good permeability;
- the cost less than those of Chevrolet Cruz;
- robbles rear suspension;
- slow heating of the cabin.
Chevrolet Cruze or Skoda Rapid
Comparing cars of Skoda Rapid and Chevrolet, car owners note the low reliability of the camshaft position measurement system on Cruze. In some cases, the engine continues to work, but at the same time there is a significant reduction in power and increase the fuel consumption. Determine the fault is quite difficult. This requires a diagnostic scanner. Eliminate the problem can only replace the sensor to the new one.
Comparison Cruze with Mazda
Chevrolet Cruz and Mazda are analyzed by key criteria in the table below.
Chevrolet comparison Cruz and Honda Civic
Honda Civic has advantages over Chevrolet Cruise, where the failure of the air flow sensor is often found. This leads to unpleasant friction and failures in acceleration. The motor begins to consume much more fuel. Troubleshooting is possible only by installing a new sensor. 
Chevrolet Cruz and Citroen C4
Unlike Citroen C4 during the operation of the turbocharged Chevrolet Motor Cruz, extraneous sounds are often observed. The inappropriate design of the Opolev phase regulators leads to the engine dysseltic engine. The cooling system pump resource is also small, so it begins to whistle when running more than 60 thousand km. These problems are extremely rare on Citroen.
At the same time, C4 often gives problems with the failure of the suspension elements. Transmission is also impossible to call reliable. The cost of the car is ranging from 1.3 million to 1.8 million rubles.
Overview of other cars
Another car similar price segment is Kia LED. The machine is characterized by good handling and security. Kia is inferior to the chevrolet in the reliability of the main nodes.
Unambiguous answer What car is better than Chevrolet Cruze or Reno Fluence is not. The first has a more modern filling, and the second is slightly reliable.
Cruz came to replace the Chevrolet Lacetti. The car inherited all the best design predecessor decisions the main advantage of Lacetti is lower cost.
The quality of the main nodes Cruise compared to Chevrolet Epic and Chevrolet Aveo is almost at the same level. At the same time, EPICA has a smaller value. Experienced car owners, with other things being equal, recommended to choose Chevrolet Cruze.
Another competitor Chevrolet Cruz is Kia Cerato. The car is characterized by dynamic and comfort. According to the reviews of the quality of Kia a little worse than Cruze.
Extremely hot spores go between the owners of Cruz and Ford Mondeo. Both cars have similar characteristics and price segment. At the same time, most drivers recognize that handling on the track is better at Cruze. 
