Hyundai Solaris or Toyota Corolla: a comparison of iron horses. What to choose - Hyundai Elantra or Toyota Corolla (Hyundai Elantra vs Toyota Corolla) Which is better than Toyota or Hyundai

Hyundai Elantra or Toyota Corolla?This question is asked by a large number of people when buying one of the cars. It is simply impossible to say for sure which car is better. Both cars are of good quality in their build.

But the article will present the main technical characteristics that will help you choose between these two cars.

Hyundai Elantra specifications

The body of the car is created as a sedan with four doors. The car uses gasoline in its work. Inside is an engine with a capacity of one hundred and twenty-two horsepower and a volume of 1591. The engine is average, the power to compare with sedans of other companies. The maximum speed of the car is one hundred and ninety kilometers per hour and the acceleration time to one hundred kilometers is ten seconds.

As we can see, the car has a fairly average speed characteristics. The car also has a five-speed gearbox, rear-wheel drive, and two pairs of disc brakes. Basic characteristics:

  • - Length 4505 mm
  • - Width 1775 mm
  • - Height 1480 mm
  • - Clearance 160 mm
  • - Tank volume 53 liters

Fuel consumption within the urban cycle is only eight liters, while outside the city the car consumes only five liters. All of the above characteristics show that the car is completely ordinary, without any distinctive features. It has medium speed characteristics, small dimensions, very low fuel consumption.

More on the topic:

This makes it possible to use the car for city and intercity driving.

Toyota Corolla specifications

Hyundai's main competitor is Toyota. These two cars are in constant competition with each other. However, there are distinctive features that are very striking when we talk about Toyota. The car is presented in the form of a five-door hatchback.

The engine has only ninety-seven horsepower. It runs on gasoline. The maximum speed of the car is one hundred and eighty-five kilometers per hour, and acceleration to one hundred kilometers is made in twelve seconds. Based at least on these characteristics, we can say that Toyota is inferior to Hyundai.

As for the consumption, it is the same as in Hyundai: the urban cycle is eight kilometers, the suburban cycle is five kilometers. The gearbox is five-speed. Key features show that Toyota is more compact than Hyundai.

  • - Length 4180 mm
  • - Width 1710 mm
  • - Height 1480 mm
  • - Tank volume 55 liters

In general, both the first and the second car are quite economical and have an average speed. They are sold at affordable prices. Considering all this, we can conclude that cars will be an excellent find for any driver.

The characteristics given in the article will help in this difficult choice. Therefore, if you still do not know what to buy: Hyundai Elantra or Toyota Corolla 2014 - read the article. Good luck!

Kia Cerato 2.0 AT Prestige

Power 150 HP Acceleration 0-100 km / h 9.3 s Price 1 119 900 rub.

Power 140 HP Acceleration 0-100 km / h 10.2 s Price RUB 1,294,000

Power 150 HP Acceleration 0-100 km / h 9.9 s Price RUB 1,294,900

Kia Cerato 2.0 AT Prestige

Toyota Corolla 1.8 CVT Style Plus

Hyundai Elantra 2.0 AT Comfort

Kia Cerato, Toyota Corolla, Hyundai Elantra

In our country, people drove golf-class sedans even before the invention of this very class - just before other cars we, by and large, did not have. And for many, father's and grandfather's "Zhiguli" and "Muscovites" formed the most desirable type of car, which now seems utterly traditional.

Text by Kirill Brevdo, photo by Alexander Obodets

What is the sedan's appeal? Now that the market is full of all sorts of different cars, the answer to this question does not seem obvious. In terms of practicality, the three-box body is far from ideal: hatchbacks and station wagons imply much wider possibilities of transformation when it comes to transporting goods. In favor of the sedan, you can come up with various arguments of any degree of persuasiveness, but the main argument will still be habit: a sedan is for all times, because it is a classic of the genre.

Recently, however, the four-door body is experiencing serious competition from new formats: the market is enslaved by crossovers. And yet, sedans have their own army of fans who cannot be seduced by a high seating position and high ground clearance, but can be enticed by design, technology, equipment and god knows what else. What exactly? We decided to check this by collecting a collection of three popular models. The main ringleader was the new Hyundai Elantra: a year ago the “Korean” got a new generation, and more recently it reached Russia. We took a Toyota Corolla to his company, which had just gone through a restyling. And the third we called Kia Cerato - the most obvious contender for Japanese and Korean cars. All cars are equipped with the most powerful engines and automatic transmissions possible. So, let's try to figure out which of the three cars is ready to deliver the maximum daily joy to its owner.



The best-selling car in the world is what the Toyota Corolla is. This model has more lives than a cat: in half a century of its dizzying career, the car has been reborn eleven times! In 2013, the Japanese celebrated the release of the 40 millionth copy - it was a car of the current generation, which has been produced since 2013. By the way, Corolla used to imply a variety of bodywork, but a few generations ago it gave up this prerogative to the Auris model, which spun off from the "King's" family.

In different markets, Corollas have always been different from each other. However, this tradition has survived to this day: for example, in America this sedan looks completely different. We sell the so-called global model with a different body design. Despite the presence of its own assembly plant near St. Petersburg, the car is transported to Russia from abroad from the Turkish Toyota plant and sold with three power units: 1.33 (99 hp), 1.6 (122 hp) and 1.8 (140 HP) liters. The weakest motor is combined only with “mechanics”, while the most powerful one assumes a default variator. But the 1.6-liter engine mates with both the manual gearbox and the CVT.



More recently, an updated Corolla has appeared on sale, with which the exterior and interior have been thoroughly retouched. The worldwide bestseller has begun to look clearly more interesting, and yet the beauty of Toyota is still not shining. However, this is just a matter of taste.

The interior of the Japanese sedan is significantly richer than in the Kia, but the Corolla is still far from the German ideals. What's wrong? Well, for example, landing at the wheel. It seems that you can get a job without problems, but after Hyundai and Kia it seems that there is not enough steering range. The front seats are softer and more amorphous than in Cerato, however, in essence, they are in no way inferior to Korean furniture: yes, they seem to be more free, but they hold tightly in turns.

The Japanese car attracts first of all with its driving characteristics: it seems the most "natural" in sensations. There is a clear and honest steering wheel, which for me is the key to good handling; comfortable suspension and a pretty bouncy engine. At first I was confused by the variator, but it is set up in a way that other "automatic machines" never dreamed of. And the interior is nicely decorated: finishing materials and build quality are satisfactory. "Toyota" seems the most comfortable due to the fact that it has a high torpedo - you feel protected in it. However, there are also disadvantages. I don’t understand why there is no parking sensor in the car worth a million and a quarter. A rear view camera is, of course, good, but there is still not enough additional sound indication of approaching an obstacle. And, of course, it freezes out the need to visit MOT every ten thousand kilometers, which greatly increases the cost of maintaining the car.


Toyota boasts the most advanced multimedia device, but its main gripe is the lack of physical buttons. Everything here is on the sensors: the screen itself and the "push buttons" around it. A special failure is the volume control: poking on the drawn plus and minus is terribly inconvenient. The buttons on the steering wheel partly solve the problem, but even they cannot be compared with the usual "round" volume control - as in Kia and Hyundai. And also this "piano lacquer" on the center console, framing the music center. Hey, gentlemen, designers of automobile companies! How long, huh? The beauty is doubtful, and in the process of use the gloss quickly loses its presentation.


Stepless variator

in the case of the "Corolla" can be considered a very successful alternative to the traditional "machine"


The tunnel is practically absent;

and there is a large distance between its casing separating the front seats and the sofa cushion


Theoretically, Toyota will include

longest load: with the sofa folded down, the distance to the backs of the front seats is maximum

But at the back, everything is not so smooth - even though there are no problems with space. The process of landing on the sofa is not overshadowed by anything, but there are fewer amenities here: there are no separate ventilation ducts, no heating; and the center armrest is too low - far below its counterparts on the door trims. But in Toyota it is easier to ride in the back row three of us: more legroom for the one who is destined to sit in the center (there is practically no tunnel; and there is a rather long distance between the casing separating the front seats and the sofa cushion).

The trunk is approximately the same size as that of competitors, and there are no special nuances in transformation: you can only fold the backrest, getting a decent step instead of a flat loading area. Theoretically, Toyota will carry the longest load - another plus. And in the minuses we will add the complete absence of devices for fixing the luggage.



It is interesting to ride the Corolla. Of course, there is no question of any drive, but the car seems very lively and responsive. The variator works great: it deftly pulls the car after the engine, without breaking the connection between the desired and the actual. The steering wheel is filled with effort and information in equal measure: the steering wheel rotates a little harder than that of the Elantra, but the transparency of the drive in the Japanese is also better. And yet it should be noted that the obvious fact that the sound insulation has been worked out more carefully. Like!



"Cerate"? "Cherato"? Serato? Inevitably, you have to think about how to pronounce the name of the Korean car correctly. You can hear a variety of options - up to the offensive "Sirota". In general, who in what way.

The current sedan is no longer young: it appeared in 2012. By the way, about the body: the first generation Cerato, which replaced the Sephia model, existed in two guises - both as a sedan and as a hatchback. However, as the generations changed, the Kia lineup took a new branch, which grew the cee "d with all its variations. And the Cerato retained only the four-door modification.

By the way, the Koreans themselves are unable to make a mistake with the name of the car: in their homeland, the sedan is sold under the designation K3. And in North America, this car is named Forte.



Cerato comes to the salons of Russian dealers from the Avtotor plant in Kaliningrad, where a full-cycle assembly has been established. The buyer has a choice between two petrol engines 1.6 and 2.0 liters; at the same time, a weaker engine is combined with both “mechanics” and “automatic”, and a two-liter power unit can be obtained only with automatic transmission.

The appearance of the "Kia", though pleasant, is painfully inconspicuous: the sedan looks like some kind of "average", besides, over the years of its existence, it has become familiar. Salon against the background of "Corolla" and "Elantra" looks, forgive me, lonely: it seems the most plastic. But this simplicity, in fact, does not spoil the impression of the car, since there are essentially no reasons for complaints: the ergonomics are good, and all the necessary amenities are present. No frills? Well, so what to do - but Cerato is cheaper than its rivals, even in conditions of equality of configurations. And for buyers of cars of this class, this is an argument!

"Kia" looks quite modern, but inside it is already noticeable that this car has been produced for several years. The salon looks quite budget-friendly, primarily because of the hard plastic, although my Jetta, whose finishing materials are also not up to par, manages to create a more noble impression. I was more confused by the persistent smell of phenol that exudes the interior - for an expensive car of a decent brand, this is completely unacceptable! But it turned out to be pleasant to ride the "Serato". I liked both the smoothness of the ride and the dynamics of acceleration. An interesting feature was the button that changes the steering wheel settings. True, I did not appreciate this innovation: in comfortable mode, the effort drops so much that it becomes almost uncomfortable (paradoxically), and in sports mode it seems as if the front wheels are slightly deflated.


Instead of a fancy multimedia with a touch-screen, the Kia has a not too sophisticated head unit with a usual “insensitive” matrix display and control of keys and knobs. However, dealing with music the old-fashioned way is much more convenient than reaching mutual understanding with more sophisticated systems decorated with large screens (like Toyota's multimedia center, for example).

A serious drawback of Cerato should be recognized the pungent smell that exudes the interior plastic. Frankly, this fact discouraged me a little: I was sure that the Koreans had won out over plastic smells for a long time. Is this really the cost of the Kaliningrad assembly? But mediocre visibility cannot be attributed to production - these are the design features. Thick A-pillars with "support" can hide an important part of the landscape behind them. The side mirrors are small, but generally informative. There was no rearview camera on our car - this is the prerogative of the top version. Premium.


6-speed "automatic"

tuned pretty well and allows the motor to fully reveal its fighting qualities


The back row is spacious

and there are no problems with landing. As in Elantra, the side seats of the sofa can be heated


Trunk cannot be opened from outside:

there is no button on the lid. You can uncork it with a key or a lever near the driver's seat

I liked the front seat: the padding is tight, the lateral support is excellent. There are no problems with adjustments: there are a minimum of them, but the ranges are sufficient, so you can instantly adjust the "furniture" for yourself. The back row is spacious, and the landing process is not overshadowed by anything - although tall citizens, it is possible, will note the not the highest doorway. As in "Elantra", the side seats of the "seratic" sofa can be heated.

The trunk is not overly impressive in both size and fittings. The lid is held on hinges, which, when closed, dive onto the load; in addition, the quality of the finish is quite dull - there is a thin rug on the floor covering the full-size spare tire. The saddest thing is the inability to open the trunk from the outside: there is no corresponding button on the lid. Alternatively, use the key, where the button is still there. Or pull the lever on the floor next to the driver's seat.

A two-liter engine, coupled with a 6-speed automatic transmission, endow the Kia with life-affirming agility. Overclocking is active, and it is convenient to manage it: the box clearly knows its business! But in terms of handling, the "Korean" is far from ideal: with sharp maneuvering at a decent speed, the car begins to sway, revealing noticeable rolls; and the steering wheel always seems empty, although with the help of the settings you can make it heavier or, conversely, lighten it to the extreme.



But with the smooth running of the "Kia" everything is quite decent: the suspension rounds out significant irregularities in favor of the inhabitants of the cabin, and dissolves small ones without a trace. True, the "Korean" seemed noisy: the song of the engine is always well heard, and other acoustic debris reaches the ears of passengers more often than in Hyundai and Toyota.



The Korean Elantra is a child of the nineties. Rather, the nineties: the production of the first generation car began in the fall of 1990 - it was a simple sedan with a 1.6-liter Mitsubishi engine. In some markets (for example, in Europe) the car was not called Elantra, but Lantra. Subsequently, other names were added: for example, in its homeland in South Korea, the car is known as Avante.

For a quarter of a century, five generations of the model managed to change, and last year the sixth "Elantra" was presented. This fall the sedan appeared in dealerships, and it was assembled in Russia at once - the car is produced at the Kaliningrad Avtotor by the SKD method. We sell modifications with 1.6 and 2.0 liter gasoline engines, each of which can be friendly with both a manual and an automatic transmission.

Externally, the Elantra has changed: the lines stopped flowing and lined up in a more strict and expressive form - and the sedan immediately visually rose in price. There is no doubt: Hyundai looks the most fresh and attractive out of our trinity. The effect is enhanced by the color - our car was painted in brick-red mother-of-pearl PhoenixOrange, which definitely attracts attention and ... money: the surcharge for any color scheme other than the basic white is ten thousand. Tolerable.



17-inch wheels on which our "Elantra" stood, a sign of the Style package (80,000 rubles), which also includes xenon, keyless entry and a Supervision dashboard with a color display. The latter in terms of graphics is similar to that on Kia, but only the image quality of the Elantra is at a fundamentally different level, although there are no special advantages in terms of functions. In terms of information content, the instruments are absolutely flawless.

Multimedia looks simpler than Toyota, solely due to the small screen size. And yet it is a full-fledged touchscreen that is easy to use. And most importantly, the volume is regulated by a normal knob, and not by touch buttons, as in the "Corolla".

If we restrict ourselves to purely superficial observations, then the interior of the Korean car makes the most favorable impression, but in reality the inner world of the Elantra is replete with hard plastic: for example, door cards are made of it almost entirely. Traces of economy can be found elsewhere: Auto mode is only provided for the driver's window, and there is no backlight in the glove box.

I cannot fail to note the design of the new "Elantra" - at last the cars of the Korean brand have found their face! It seems to me that many buyers will be tempted by looks alone. And the interior looks very even - it looks clearly more expensive than the interior of the Kia, although the quality of the materials does not match the Toyota. And yet, there is a certain contradiction in the car - especially in terms of the equipment: here is the fattest stuffing, which contrasts with annoying shortcomings like the glove compartment without illumination and power windows, devoid of automatic mode (only the driver has it). In terms of dynamics, Hyundai is slightly behind Kia, but it drives a little more interesting, although I still liked Toyota more.


From the point of view of visibility, Hyundai is clearly better than Kia: the mirrors are the same in shape, but the front pillars are noticeably thinner. The rear view camera prompts the trajectory - unlike the Corolla, where the lines in the picture do not move when the steering wheel is turned.

The chairs are similar in shape to the Cerato seats, but they are covered with something leather-like. The question of whether such furniture is needed in a relatively inexpensive car, we will move beyond the discussion. But there is no doubt that an ordinary "rag" is more comfortable: in summer the skin heats up quickly and cools slowly. As for winter, there is no need to worry: like in Kia, all seats and steering wheel are heated in the Elantra.


In the "Elantra" in the back row

there is a distinct lack of headroom - this is due to the sloping roof


The only noticeable difference

luggage racks of Korean cars are reduced to an elastic mesh in the cargo compartment of "Elantra"

In terms of space in the back row, Hyundai is comparable to Cerato, but the three of them will not be so comfortable to sit: there is less distance from the lining of the central tunnel to the sofa, so the passenger in the center will not be very comfortable. In addition, in "Elantra" there is clearly a lack of headroom - this is due to the sloping roof.

The trunk is normal, although it should be noted that here, too, a full-size spare wheel on a cast disc is hiding underground.

The two-liter Elantra rides briskly, though not as lively as the Cerato. But I liked the chassis settings much more than that of the Korean brother: the suspension is not so relaxed, but at the same time it is in no way inferior in terms of smoothness - even adjusted for tires with a smaller profile. And the energy intensity is quite decent: you won't scare Hyundai even with relatively large irregularities - rather, you will be scared yourself.

The last decade has been a period of global changes in the world arena in the automotive industry. Recognized market leaders have long been squeezed by new players from developing countries, but this phenomenon has reached global proportions relatively recently. One can observe the increasing filling of the market share by South Korean cars, which previously belonged entirely to products from Japan. Today, Koreans have gradually stepped over the level of "budget" cars, leaving this niche exclusively to manufacturers from China. Japanese-made cars remain the main competitor for the auto giant Hyundai. Our further comparative review is aimed at acquainting the reader more closely with two bright and highly demanded competitor models in the domestic market.

Hyundai elantrais a front-wheel drive 5-seater sedan, which belongs to the "C" -class. The fifth generation of the model received a restyling and was presented to the public in August 2013. There are two naturally aspirated petrol engines with 1.6 and 1.8 liters displacement with automatic or manual transmission.

Toyota Corolla is a Class C front wheel drive sedan. The car was presented already in the eleventh generation in June 2013. The range of engines includes atmospheric gasoline units for 1.3, 1.6 and 1.8 liters of useful working volume, which can be aggregated both "automatically" and "mechanically".

Review models were released in 2014, received 1.6-liter power units, a pair of which is an automatic transmission.

Hyundai elantra

The concept of the manufacturer in the form of "flowing lines" is perfectly reflected in the design of the sedan. Strict corners are smoothed out neatly and elegantly with smooth, light rounds. It should be noted that this did not in any way affect the overall impression of the front of the car. The car turned out to be pretty, serious and businesslike. Tapered headlights extend far into the front fenders, and the muscles in the bonnet successfully accentuate the intricate shape of the headlights. The upper grille is a solution with a focus on decor over functionality. The chrome line and large logo are the main elements of this body part. The lower grille with longitudinal lines and the transparent "boomerangs" of the fog lamps with chrome trim visually pull the massive bumper protruding forward.

The side of the car immediately attracts attention with the wide stamping line of the wheel arches. A sweeping stripe in the area of \u200b\u200bthe door handles cascades from the rear optics to the front, adding austerity to the soft design of the profile. The dropping "teardrop" roof is very suitable for the model, adding swiftness. The soft contours of the glass area and the very aesthetic side mirrors with turn signals blend harmoniously into the exterior. The back of the model looks solid and presentable. Narrow and long longitudinal stop lamps give the stern impressiveness and solidity. The tailgate edge hanging over the rear optics makes the car look rich and respectable. The large rear bumper has a familiar mix of soft and clean lines, as well as a practical black insert in the lower overhang.

Toyota Corolla

The front part is austere and has a rich chrome finish. The longitudinal narrow grille is combined with head optics, visually encircling the front of the sedan. Cute DRL inserts in the headlights attract attention, adding solidity to an already austere car. The shapes and lines are quite simple, but this is the secret of success. The front bumper cannot be called massive, but the large black lower grille with long stripes of black plastic adds lightness to the overall perception. The triangular black inserts for the front fog lamps are moved closer to the edges of the front end. The lower overhang is painted in the same color as the body, forming the visual completeness of the design of all body and decorative elements.

The profile turned out to be classic, without pretentious and controversial decisions. The roof of the car does not have a tendency to drop towards the rear. The side glazing area tapers a little closer to the stern, and the wide black pillars in the very center look quite impressive. The wheel arches did not stand out strongly, having realized the medium-width stamping along the contour. The sideline is clearly visible in the area of \u200b\u200bthe door handles, aligning the machine from stern to bow. The rear of the car keeps up with the front. The lip on the boot lid is adorned with a wide chrome strip above the license plate mount, continued with transparent inserts on the taillights. The rear optics themselves have sharp corners that successfully complement the overall design. The rear bumper is powerful and wide, with neatly rounded sides.

Choosing the final winner at this stage of the comparison was not an easy task. The Hyundai Elantra and Toyota Corolla are global products that manufacturers have made a major bet on in the fight for the consumer, so both cars look very good.
The favorite is the Hyundai Elantra. The sedan looks larger and more solid than its competitor Toyota Corolla. Visually, the Korean car can even be mistaken for the initial class "D", which is an indisputable merit of the car designers. I would also like to add that the technique of stretching the profile or the stern, which is often used by manufacturers to achieve the "big car for little money" effect, is not observed. The sedan looks large, harmonious, harmonious and complete.

Salon

Hyundai elantra

Smooth lines in the outlines of the body were continued in the interior design of the car. Black became the dominant color, and the main design touches were emphasized by the silver color. The quality of materials is at a level quite sufficient for the class. Hard plastic with small inserts of a soft coating dominates the interior of the car, but its texture does not make the interior space cheaper in any way. The assembly and fitting of all elements is made on a solid five, with no visible gaps or crevices. The rectangular side deflectors are edged with silver plastic.

The main element of the dashboard is the center console, which received a large rectangular screen of the multimedia system. Above there is a thin strip with a monochrome display of an electronic clock. On the left and right sides there are vertical central air ducts. The pushbuttons that surround the system's screen are diluted with a circular center knob that stands out from the crowd with its chrome bezel.

Slightly lower is the car's air conditioning control unit, recessed in depth. A central button was placed above the climate control screen to activate the alarm. The unit itself boasts a medium-sized display and a neat circular knob in the very center. The functional element was also finished with chrome.

The central tunnel is high, made in one piece with the center console and separates the driver and passenger areas. Its side parts have received a design in the form of narrow stripes of gray plastic. The tunnel begins with a closing niche for storing small items. Next is the gearbox selector lever, which is pressed against the edge of the specified niche. The lever is finished in lacquered black plastic and also features a thin chrome wrap ring at the bottom of the handle.

The next element is deep and spacious open-type cup holders. They are located longitudinally and have thin threads of chromium along the contour. The high center armrest with a wide cushion has proven to be very comfortable and does its job well.

The door cards themselves are quite interesting. Soft lines, successfully accentuated by silver plastic, perfectly dilute the monotonous black interior.

The seats are comfortable and have a wide range of available plane adjustments. The finishing materials of the chairs are of good quality, the seams and stitching are neat and not striking. The seat padding, like the lateral bolsters, offers comfort. Dynamic driving cannot be completely ruled out, but this car has not received significant emphasis on aggressive drive.

The steering wheel has an interesting shape. The steering wheel is four-spoke, but very aesthetically pleasing. Each spoke has rows of function buttons for interacting with multimedia and communications systems. Chrome inserts on the inner sides of the spokes make the steering wheel look light. The rim is of medium thickness, covered with good material. The steering wheel is quite confident in the hands, the radius and rim are well matched. The steering column can be adjusted for reach and tilt.

The visor, which has leaned significantly forward, hides the tachometer and speedometer on the dashboard. The devices themselves are deeply set, and the edges of the wells received familiar chrome stripes along the contour. In the upper part, between the wells, there is a small screen of the trip computer. The information is read intuitively, so this is no problem. The instruments and buttons of the car are backlit in bright white and blue. In the dark, readings on instrument scales and displays are highly legible.

Toyota Corolla

The interior of the car can be called at the same time modest, technological and slightly non-standard. The main material is hard plastic with softening inserts, as well as a combination of fabric materials with leather. The side deflectors are rectangular in shape with a beveled edge. The edging of the bottom for these elements is chrome strips.

The first thing you immediately notice is the "sheer" central panel. The torpedo resembles those solutions that were widely used in premium cars of the early 90s, only the materials are different. The location and design of the central rectangular air vents immediately brought to mind the interior of the old Audi 100. A well-forgotten classic, not otherwise. It seemed a bit strange to move the small display of the electronic clock to the right side, closer to the passenger.

Under the deflectors there is a large lacquered insert, visually separated from the top of the dashboard with a chrome strip. It houses a multimedia system with a fairly decent-sized screen. On the left and right are vertical rows of buttons at the bottom, and on top are small circular knobs that have received silver trim rings.

The air conditioning control unit has a dedicated space under the multimedia system, which hangs over its relatively small panel. The climate control system has a narrow monochrome display at the top, large round knobs on the sides, and function keys fill the rest of the space.

The central tunnel has a one-piece design with a torpedo. Each element, starting from the very top, occupies a kind of "step" on the central panel, separated by the edge of the protruding plane. This last step was the beginning of the tunnel. The closed niche is just below the climate block. The following is the installation location of the gearshift lever. The selector was slightly raised above the general plane of the tunnel, finishing the entire "island" with black lacquer and chrome.

This is followed by the longitudinally located cup holders and the parking brake lever, which is closer to the driver's seat. The cup holders have a thin silvery outline, which dilutes the overall dark range well. The center armrest is not very wide, but it is more than enough for a comfortable hand position.

The seats are medium hard, the cornering support is well implemented. The material of the seats is pleasing both visually and tactilely, promising a proper level of durability. Accessible adjustment in all planes allows you to achieve a comfortable fit almost immediately.

The steering wheel is light, three-spoke, small in diameter. It has a rim of medium thickness, which is covered with quality material. The multifunction steering wheel has soft and very comfortable joystick buttons on the horizontal spokes. The vertical spoke has a wide silver insert at the bottom. The rim is of medium thickness, so it is very comfortable to hold the handlebars. The steering column is adjustable for reach and height.

The dashboard is protected by a small visor, has a large speedometer on the right side, a tachometer on the left, and a large rectangle for the main indicators and trip computer in the very center. The information is quite readable, and large instrument scales are another plus. Illumination of devices and keys is made using blue and white colors.

Both cars have a quality interior. This applies to materials, assembly and design. The Korean model Hyundai Elantra looks solid and even cozy, and the ergonomics of the interior did not cause any comments. Toyota Corolla showed a classic styling that has undergone some modernization. The design of the central panel gave the cabin of the "Japanese" freedom and space, which is a big plus.
The winner at this stage is the Toyota Corolla. There are several reasons for this decision. The first was that the materials of this sedan's trim are very few, but better, especially in comparison with the competitor. The second reason is the "freedom" that the taut center panel gives. The third one was exactly that “classic” novelty in design, which is an original solution for a modern car.

Driving performance

Hyundai Elantra

Received an independent design at the front, based on a McPherson-type spring suspension. The rear suspension is of the semi-dependent type. Consists of a torsion beam equipped with coil springs and a stabilizer.

Engine power the car is enough, but active drive is not expected. Good traction at medium revs allows you to accelerate well in the mode of permitted speeds. The lack of power can be felt when overtaking on the highway and with several passengers in the cabin. The 6-speed Shiftronic box tries to keep the engine in a crisp middle in normal operation.

Suspension copes well with small and medium irregularities in the road surface. You can highlight the smoothness and energy intensity. But to bring the suspension to a breakdown is within the power of a pit of slightly greater depth. Additional questions arise about the noise of the chassis, as well as the noise insulation of the wheel arches. It's all pretty mediocre. The engine compartment is well insulated, the engine is clearly audible only when the tachometer needle rises to the peak torque.

Steering easy to park, has medium information content at speed. The car holds the road well, there is no wind and swing. Drift along the axles and slight rolls of the front end will manifest themselves only with an unreasonable search at speed.

Braking implemented well. Disc brakes on all wheels allow for some harshness. The ABS system sometimes demonstrates premature operation, but such cases are rare.

Toyota Corolla

It has an independent MacPherson strut at the front, which is equipped with an anti-roll bar. The rear suspension is semi-independent, with a reliable torsion beam.

Power unit good acceleration of a family car from a standstill and briskly turns to peak torque. A 7-speed CVT variator allows you to achieve good dynamics at the start. You shouldn't count on a vigorous overtaking in track mode, but the engine allows you to dynamically accelerate.

Chassis tuned for comfortable movement. The energy intensity of the Corolla's suspension is at a height, which has always distinguished the cars of this brand. It is also worth noting the fact that there is no significant noise when the suspension is working out bumps of medium depth or a comb. Soundproofing of the wheel arches is a C grade, but the engine compartment has a good level of insulation.

Control the car represents the right balance between comfort and active driving. The reactions of the car to the steering wheel are quite clear, but are smoothed out by small rolls during sharp maneuvers. At permitted speeds, you should not be afraid of drift along the axles, the car holds the road well.

Brakes very good for a city sedan. Disc mechanisms on all wheels are able to provide even and confident deceleration. Assisted electronic systems keep the car in a straight line, without yawing or pulling.

A comparison of cars on the move determined the Toyota Corolla sedan as the winner. The car handles slightly better than its Hyundai Elantra rival. Suspension "Japanese" works quieter and a little more comfortable. A more powerful powertrain could well become the strength of the Korean model, but a practical test did not reveal such an advantage. It was a well-deserved victory for Toyota Corolla.

Spaciousness

Hyundai elantraprovides a confident reserve of free space for front row passengers. The high center tunnel does not restrict foot space. The stock in width and height is sufficient for most riders of any size and height. A large role in this was played by the competent design and well-thought-out ergonomics.

The back row is quite typical for the class. A good indicator of the wheelbase has become a guarantee that there is just as much legroom for the rear passengers as is needed for a comfortable trip. Tall riders can rest their knees on the back, but this looks more like an exception. There is enough space in the shoulders even for three, but only two passengers in the back row will be able to move completely comfortably. There is also a margin above the head, albeit insignificant.

The trunk of the sedan has an acceptable height and width of the loading bay, and also has good roominess. Bags, suitcases and boxes won't be a big problem. The main thing is not to clog the compartment to the very top, since the trunk lid has hinges.

Toyota Corolla allows you to feel quite free in the front row. Nothing gets in the way of the knees of the driver and passenger, and space in width and height is provided even with a small margin. The ergonomics in the cabin are also satisfactory, everything is at hand and it is convenient to interact with the elements.

In the back row, a picture familiar to the "C" -class opens up. Legroom for rear passengers is sufficient, but the margin is small. Tall riders can potentially feel even a lack of this stock. The tilt angle of the sofa and the body structure provide ample headroom. It will not be a problem to fit three riders, but only two can sit comfortably.

The trunk has a wide and high loading aperture. You can place medium-sized loads. The trunk lid has hinges in its design, so that they will take away some of the free space at the very top. The sedan will cope with most everyday tasks, and this is the main thing.

Cars are on the same level in terms of their elephant roominess and luggage compartment. The difference is minimal, but still present. The Hyundai Elantra felt a bit more spacious than its Toyota Corolla rival. These additional millimeters ensured the victory for the car at this stage.

Profitability

The Toyota Corolla is slightly ahead of its Hyundai Elantra rival in terms of fuel efficiency.

Security

Base model Hyundai Elantra:

  1. aBS system

Euro NCAP crash test result: 4 stars.

Basic model:

  1. aBS system
  2. eBD system
  3. brake Assist system
  4. frontal airbags for driver / passenger

Euro NCAP crash test result: 5 stars.

The Toyota Corolla appears to be a safer vehicle, performing better than the Hyundai Elantra. The second plus is the excellent basic vehicle security systems.

Toyota and Hyundai have earned the image of solid concerns that make reliable cars. The price of cars has become significantly more expensive compared to its predecessors, which creates a lot of questions as to whether it is worth paying more and which car to prefer, given approximately the same price category.

Appearance

The basic concept of the Hyundai Elantra is based on the principle of flowing lines. There are quite strict corners here, smoothed out using smooth and discreet rounding lines. In front, the car is pretty pretty, but with a serious and businesslike look. The headlights are narrowed and they flow to the fenders, and far enough. The shape of the hood only emphasizes the rather complex shape of the entire optics.

The radiator grill, which is located on top, has more of a decorative task than functionality. The bottom grill has lines that flow along it. The transparent chrome-plated fog lamp glass allows for a slight reduction in the protruding bumper. Chromed lines and a large logo make the car stand out from the front.

2017 Elantra Sport

From the side, the car draws a lot of attention to the wide line of wheel arches. Near the door handles there is a strip that is directed from the rear optics to the front, it provides a more austere look of the car.

2017 Elantra Sport

The roof is teardrop-shaped, which has a soft flow and goes into the profile of the car. The soft contours and interesting glazing give the car a unique look. The side mirrors complement the vehicle's appearance and include turn signals.

At the back, the car is solid and quite presentable. The lanterns are narrow and oblong. The trunk lid hangs over the optics somewhat, which gives a respectable look. The rear bumper is large enough and oversized, and the exterior is in the same flowing style. Underneath the bumper is a black insert along the entire overhang.

As for the Toyota Corolla, the front side is quite strict, and the chrome inserts give a rich look. A strip of lattice and main optics seems to encircle the car in front. Front DRL inserts grab attention and create a more solid look. Along the lines, the sedan is quite simple, this is what the emphasis is on. The front bumper is small. Black inserts in the shape of a triangle, where the fog lights are installed, are shifted more towards the front.

2017 Toyota Corolla SX.

The overall profile of the car is quite classic, there are no solutions "for amateurs" here. The roof is also not restrained, and the side glazing tapers somewhat towards the rear. In the center, the glazing is diluted with black wide pillars.

At the rear, a decorative chrome strip complements the overall elegant design, along the edges it flows into transparent inserts. The optics are acute-angled, and the bumper is large enough and wide, well flowing to the body.

Both designs are quite interesting, but the objective perception shows the Hyundai car more solid, thanks to the size and special design.

Interior

At first glance, it becomes clear that Hyundai has chosen their own and unique design. The front panel has a cascading drop-down view. The steering wheel has a rather large core, which has already become a standard for the manufacturer. The devices are made in the form of broken sockets. The appearance of the devices is similar to the I30 model, and of the significant differences is the concave console, which is located in the center. The radio and climate control units are made in the original design.

The plastic used for the upholstery has a soft texture and black color. The inlay is neat enough with chrome elements embedded in it to give the impression of an expensive car.

The interior of Toyota Corolla is somewhat modest and even non-standard, but at the same time technological. It is based on hard plastic, but it is complemented by soft inserts from fabric and genuine leather. The deflectors on the sides are rectangular, but the edges are slightly cut off. The edging is made of chrome.

The multimedia system is quite compact and in design resembles the classic look of premium cars from the 90s. Under the multimedia center there is a climate control unit with a narrow monochrome screen and a row of keys.

The steering wheel is light enough with three spokes and generally has a small diameter. The material of the cover is of high quality, the buttons are quite comfortable, and the spoke that is directed downward has an insert with a silver color.

The choice between cars should be made based on:

  • Hyundai Elantra is a modern design, high-quality performance with a wide range of functions;
  • Toyota Corolla is an updated classic look with plenty of room, great styling and a comfortable arrangement of controls.

Running performance

In terms of acceleration speed, Elantra is ahead of the opponent by 0.5 sec with an indicator of 11.1 sec. The Korean manufacturer also has an advantage in terms of maximum speed - 195 km / h, which is 10 km more. Power by 8 hp surpasses the Japanese competitor, and in terms of torque by 6 Nm. Thus, Hyundai bypassed Toyota in all respects, albeit not by much.

Power

Hyundai accelerates well, although it is not intended for driving trips. Acceleration in all permissible speed limits is carried out efficiently and confidently. Integrated 6-speed gearbox. Power may be somewhat lacking when overtaking on highways with passengers in the car. The noise of the car is quite high.

Toyota has a stable acceleration and brings it to the peak quite confidently. The 7-speed gearbox does its job well. Overtaking on the track is with average performance. The chassis is more comfortable. The ride is quite comfortable in different conditions.

Capacity

The trunk volume of Toyota is 452 liters, while Hyundai's is 470 liters.


So the Korean has enough free space for passengers in the front. There is enough free space for most people, regardless of body size and height. The back row of passengers is not deprived of space, it is quite enough for a comfortable journey, except for very tall people. Full comfort is provided for 2 people, although they can fit up to 3. There is a small gap above the head. The trunk is very good in height and width, so the luggage will fit without much difficulty.

At the same time, the Japanese car provides free space for the front row, even a little remains. The back row has enough space, but there is practically no stock, tall people may feel a lack of space. There is enough space up to the ceiling with a margin. But the trunk is wide and the space for transportation is high. Medium-sized loads fit perfectly.

Consumption

It is more profitable to use Toyota, because in the city the consumption will be 8.2 liters as opposed to 9.0 liters for Hyundai. Consumption on the highway is the same and is 5.3 liters. With a mixed rhythm of the trip, approximately 6.3 liters for a Japanese car and 6.7 liters for a Korean car diverge.

Security

The base Hyundai model has multiple front airbags as well as an ABS system. According to the results of the crash test, the car was awarded 4 stars.

For Toyota Corolla, the situation is more rosy:

  • Brake Assist;
  • Airbags.

In the crash test, 5 safety stars were marked, which shows a clear advantage of the Japanese brainchild.

Price

The average price for the minimum configuration of Hyundai Elantra is $ 18,500. At this time, the Toyota Corolla costs $ 17,400. The difference, though small, is significant.

Output

In general, both cars have advantages, and they are approximately equal to each other. All the magic is in the little things, it is here that in most cases the Hyundai Elantra loses, albeit slightly. It turns out that Toyota Corolla is slightly better than its competitor, but the choice should be based on your own design preferences, because the differences in power are not very significant.

Corolla or Solaris - which car is better? This question cannot be answered unambiguously without understanding the topic. Both vehicles are known for their quality and reliability. Even their pricing policy is about the same. This article will tell a potential buyer which iron horse is better for him to invest in.

External data

2016 release (standard) - the brainchild of Japanese developers. The machine has a rounded shape. The car looks quite ergonomic. The body cannot boast of a high ground clearance, which makes it almost impossible to drive on rough terrain. The front of the vehicle looks quite stylish. The chrome-plated radiator grille deserves special attention. In general, the appearance is classic - everything looks simple, stylish and interesting.

2016 year of release (complete set Active) - the famous "Korean", which is one of the most popular cars in the Russian Federation. Despite the relatively low price, the iron horse looks quite expensive. The body is a bit like Toyota, but only distantly. If you look closely, you realize that the Korean car has more large parts. For example, large headlights. They are wide near the radiator grill, and towards the fenders they begin to taper, which looks very interesting. With clearance, too, not everything is perfect - it is quite low. The appearance is of great interest to buyers. The doors are especially beautifully made: they have two transitions in the form of waves, which add extravagance to the body.

Technical specifications

In order to accurately answer the question of which is better, you will definitely have to figure out the technical characteristics of the iron horses. Don't just figure it out, but make a thorough comparison.

The volume of the power unit of the "Japanese" is 1.3 liters, and the "Korean" - 1.6. It is logical to assume that the power of the second is higher - 99 horses, against 123. The maximum speed is 180 and 190 kilometers per hour, respectively. At the moment, Hyundai is outright winning against its opponent.

Toyota has a larger luggage compartment - 50 liters, against 43 Solaris.

An important point is transmission... These configurations are equipped with manual gearboxes that have six speeds. By adding a sixth gear, drivers have the opportunity to significantly reduce fuel consumption. As for the consumption itself, this parameter is one of the most important. For a hundred in mixed mode, Corolla spends 6-6.5 liters, but Hyundai Solaris - 7, or even all 8. If you want to save money, then make a choice in favor of the Japanese.

Acceleration to 100 kilometers for Hyundai takes 11.5 seconds, and for Toyota - 12.8. The difference is not that big, given that the vehicles described are extremely rarely purchased in order to drive them. Type of drive - front on two cars. As for the functionality, there is a draw here, because the simplest assemblies are described.

These are actually all the main technical characteristics that will be needed to draw up a general picture for readers. The rest of the parameters can be found on the dealers' website.

Price policy

Today, the average price for a Toyota Corolla is 891 thousand rubles in the simplest assembly. Want a more solid option? Get ready to shell out an amount of about one and a half million rubles. For Hyundai Solaris the price is 705 thousand. Naturally, the better the assembly, the higher the costs.