The love of our compatriots to the sedans are incomprehensible and dimensionless. The incarnation of the ideas of the Volkswagen Jetta car is named after a strong gust of the wind. The most complete name of this wind stream - Jet Stream, which can rush and develop speed up to 160 km / h.
Cars Volkswagen Jetta or competitor Opel Astra were produced for markets on which these modifications are widely demanded. Astra-Sedan is a competitor of Mexican German. Although the "Astra" and the name is not a formidable, but also a simple garden flower is not called it. This brand of cars has long been accustomed to consider natural hatchback, although earlier its name was the name "Cadet".
Recorded with all the traditions of Opel Astra began to produce not only in the body of a sedan and hatchback, but also offered two more Ipostasi: a convertible and wagon. Buyers have a choice. The German developers have created related sedan and hatchback models, but not for sales in their own country. Of course, it is impossible to argue, they are in the presence of German car markets and have the demand of the population, but not with such inspiration, as their five-door conifers.
Astra and Jetta produce and collect far from their homeland, and it relates them to them, although Opel Astra is relative and closer to us, because These rapid sedans securely secured under St. Petersburg, but the German is still manitis and attracts something. However, there will be enough ideas, let's go to the real characteristics and discussion.
In order to objectively and impartially compare the Opel Astra model (sedan) and the similar option - Volkswagen Jetta, we suggest to get acquainted with the main characteristics of the car.
| General | ||
| Model | Volkswagen Jetta. | Opel Astra. |
| Full weight, kg | 2020 | 2065 |
| Curb weight, kg | 1375 | 1393 |
| Gabarits. | ||
| Length | 4644 | 4658 |
| Width | 1778 | 1814 |
| Height | 1482 | 1500 |
| The volume of the trunk, l | 510 | 475 |
| Wheelbase | 2651 | 2685 |
| Front track / rear | 1535/1532 | 1544/1558 |
| Clearance | 140 | 165 |
| Engine | ||
| Fuel supply type | direct injection, as well as additional turbocharging | |
| Volume, cm 3 | 1390 | 1364 |
| The number of cylinders and their location | 4, inline location | |
| Cylinder diameter and piston stroke, mm | 76.5x75.6. | 72.5x82.6. |
| Number of valves | 16 | |
| Engine power, hp | 150 | 140 |
| Accurate (MAX), km / h | 215 | 205 |
| Overclocking time up to 100 km / h, with | 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Torque (MAX), NHM / rpm | 240/4500 | 200/4900 |
| Transmission | ||
| Type of gearbox | 6 MCPP / 7 automatic transmission DSG | 6 automatic transmission |
| type of drive | Front-wheel drive | |
| Fuel consumption for standards 93/116 / EEC, l / 100 km | ||
| Fuel tank capacity, l | 55 | 56 |
| Urban cycle, l | 8.1 | 7.1 |
| Country cycle, l | 5.2 | 4.6 |
| Mixed cycle, l | 6.3 | 5.5 |
Opel Astra or Volkswagen Jetta: Choosing a Heart or Mind
We will analyze the benefits of each car individually and find out what is better: Hatchback Astra or Jetta Sedan. Let's start, perhaps, from the most popular model. Volkswagen Jetta justifies all the expectations of the buyer. Designer ideas are based on a rectangle rule. Panel, buttons, screen and the entire interior consist of rectangles and right lines. If the "Folswage" creators were based on Euclidean geometry, then the volume buttons and microclimate control knobs would be the same form as the entire interior. But the mind won, and the designers took advantage of the Circle, and not only by direct and angular subjects of mathematics.
Also, the designers created a discovered dashboard visor and the scale on it. The classic won. Rectangular LCD display on the panel like a four-stranded yum from Pushkin works. Many will ask: "Convenient? - Sure! Boring? - it could be worse! Qualitatively? - Perhaps! ", Although the neatly docked panel of soft plastic causes lunizing, despite the simple lines in the interior of the car.
But if we talk about the doors, then this is a purely Mexican direction. An unpleasant and oppressive impression is left by such errors, as, incomprehensible origin, the skin substitute for upholstery or non-accurate dusting of the windowsill. The sound occurring at the closure of the doors cannot be attributed to German production technologies, it seems that there is a lot of space inside the panels for which the wind quietly walks. Uncomfortable, agree?
Comparing what is better today: the Golf Class sedan of Jetta or the Opolevskaya Astra, then compared to the first option, Astra has to himself and enchants. Smooth lines in the interior design circle their head, enveloping bends bring the highlight, and the backlight in the night is puzzled and mysteriousness. This car, it would seem, boldly call the "premium class", however, it is worth it and consider closer - and the fairy tale is the end! The quality of plastic with ridiculous shiny edging, leaves much to be desired.
It is also incomprehensible for which the "Circling" is arranged on the front panel, consisting of four handles, with rotating mechanisms, and several dozen buttons on the console. The onboard electronics is not acceptable for such cars, control and use of it is irrationally, inefficient and difficult. Knippel of four positions hidden in the washer, which, in turn, reacts and rotates with any incorrect movement, inconvenient, any error when searching for the necessary function - and all efforts are in vain, as they say. This is not of modernity, and is clearly not suitable for advanced motorists. The output suggests itself: Jetta sedan is an excellent player, but makes adjustments from another parallelism of reality with unusual elements; Astra - does not reach the desired consumer level, but for an attempt - worthy of respect.
Opel Astra or Volkswagen Jetta: Who is hospitable?
Volkswagen Jetta. Last Salon and Sofa amazes with its magnificence and luxury. It can be bolder to declare that this car can be attributed to the models of the highest classification. Unexpected freedom for legs and knees, stunning. So I want to ask the highest person, two-meter growth, sit down and evaluate the "Volkswagen" geometry. Invited, asked, sat down - appreciated! Not a single complaint did not come.
However, if three passengers are already on the sofa, then comfort will fall, it will interfere with the center tunnel. This is a fee for such a chic all-wheel drive Volkswagen platform. But, in the "shoulders" nowhere will not be hidden, the rear doors are equipped with comfortable armrests. If two is sitting, and not three, then places more than abuse. Plus a wide interstit armrest to better appreciate the comfort. Unfortunately, for those sitting behind the driver of passengers, the amenities are ending with this.
Opel Astra. Rear for passengers is a retractable container and a 12 volt socket. Three oversized sedacaries will be able to fit on the seat. But, landing to the rear seat of three guests is already a feat, the roof of the roof is bought in hatchback and an incredibly high threshold. Oblocked "Folkswagenovsky" will not work - interfere with extensive armrests. And this is not all difficulties. There is not enough place for feet, and this is all that the wheelbase is unsuccessfully located. Conclusion: for transportation with comfort, preferably Volkswagen Jetta.
What is more and more practical?
Take, for example, a conventional resident of the megapolis, which went out of shopping from the store. He has a long time in his hands and at the same time very heavy, which must be put in the car trunk. So, what car will become a real assistant in a difficult situation: Jetta sedan or Astra hatchback.
Aster. In order to open the trunk, you can choose two ways: to find the desired button on the key and press it, or open the door doors and search for the desired button on the console. Of course, in order to fulfill any maneuver, you will have to leave a purchase and decay the trunk. Somehow not very convenient, right?
Jetta. Everything is much easier here. The button, to open the trunk compartment, is located according to the classic scheme, but with signaling vehicles, nevertheless, you need to remove, otherwise nothing will work. You can open from the cabin itself. The only advantage over astors is, it is not a freight compartment cover, and smooth and moderate lifting. Wait is not afraid, convenient?
In order to transport long periods, both cars are equipped with hatches. However, there is a difference. In Opel, a triangle hanging on the loop makes it possible to open, in Volkswagen - on plastics in the hands of the car owner. For those who are just alone, the Luke is not enough: Jetta has to pull the handle from the car cargo department and, putting the muscle strength, push the back of the seating; Opel - everything is simple and understandable, in the spirit of European traditions.
Opel Astra or Volkswagen Jetta: Engine - Power
For those who save, in both cars there are aggregates without an inflatable version with a volume of 1.6 liters, which can be controlled by both mechanics and machine gun. Although Astra's engine is stronger in relics in tens of times, but Jetta is high-speed. Jetta boasts a shrine work of hydromechanics, 1.5 seconds higher than that of Astra. A person who buys a car for a ride must pay special attention to the turbo engines that should be the same volume. Buying Volkswagen Jetta, you can choose among two versions: turbine motor at 122 or 150 horses.
It is worth noting that any of the versions makes it possible to squeeze the adhesion itself or provide this job with a box with a multi-disc two-chaired module. If you look from the point of view of comfortableness - everything is all this, but if you are a lover of a good ride with a sharp gap from the start, then this option is most suitable for you. The start without tiles occurs in almost 10 seconds, and in more powerful versions - for 8 with a little.
What do we answer Opel manufacturers? Turbo - "Four" in power can only be combined with hydromechanism in 6 steps, dynamic driving lovers worth setting up the engine and box. But any version, even the most sophisticated, is greatly inferior to Jett. Astra record 9.2 seconds to 100 km / hour, modest than Volkswagen model.
Opel Astra or Volkswagen Jetta: better on turns
Volkswagen Jetta. Any driver of this brand should always be remembered which motor is under the hood. The thoroughbred lever with excellent elastokinematics is designed for countries developed in the field of annularization. Non-in-law, an archaic motor - for a calmer ride in the attitude of ordinary cities of Russia, but no one bothers ride. The sedan is endowed with the Rail confidence of Multilink, which allows you to go confidently and purposefully. However, you should not trust the electronics, it is best - this is a concentration of attention, it does not hurt.
Opel Astra. Mechanics are simple and independent of the power of the engine. Even the most powerful models are equipped with a semi-dependent scheme with a tough, which is reliably and convenient, and much better in control. Opel will not allow errors, but there will be no special pleasure.
Opel Astra or Volkswagen Jetta: bumps and irregularities on the road
Jetta Sedan is inclined to react to the bumps, and transmit such sensations of inconvenience to their passengers. The fastest punch with the wheel, the more shaking in the cabin. It is not recommended to buy special discs to travel comfortably, because An unpleasant sensation is directly related to the number of space occupied in the cabin. But the suspension surprises, it is better than the analogs and slides on the uneven track, as in the waves. The microclimate is also not very pleased, in the cold season - the first 10 km will be torture. Next - better, but not much.
Astra - Volkswagen antipode in the body of a sedan, as the stove works better, pits and irregularities - everything is not necessary, which means the maximum comfort, for sitting passengers in the car. But there are also unpleasant moments. Transparent, even too, arches of wheels. And this car is more noisy than the Jetta sedan. If there were not two of these shortcomings, the deserved victory would be aster.
Opel Astra or Volkswagen Jetta: Testing
Both machines are tested according to the protocol of the European Charter, i.e. Auto cling at the catapult, develop speed up to 65 km / h and here it is, a barrier for impact. And this test, both cars, passed on perfectly. However, it was not without nuances: Jetta showed the best result in a collision with the barrier and won the nominations "Children's Security", and Opel Astra - withstand a superb blow from side. All this happened at the highest level. According to the overall security, the Astra is equipped with a stabilization system, but you will have to lay out a round sum for "curtains" (it only applies to Opel Cosmo). Acquisitioners "Jetty", all air runs are available in Treedline.
Opel Astra or Volkswagen Jetta: Cost and complete set
As the advertisers say, for the troubled Opel, the buyer will have to put about 675,000 rubles. This cost includes: mechanics, basic motor power with 1.6 l engine volume, 4 pillows and ESP, air conditioning system, driving seat heating and advanced passenger, front electric windows, steel discs, more or less audio system and alarm. For Sedan Jetta, you will have to post a more substantial amount - 702,000 rubles. Astra-space with a turbo engine is about 913 thousand. What is better to choose to buyer.
The choice is yours!
In general, the purchase options for models with a variety of features and packages of additional services, a lot, everyone chooses what fits him in finance, but do not forget about style. The intricacy and complex structure of both cars does not fully deal with the cost of a model. Jetta in the body of the sedan is better and more expensive, but not much, and Astra has a balanced price tag and more, a rich arsenal bells.
For car markets more independent model - Jetta Sedan. And it is not surprising. Latin American German was ahead of the Astra on a disciplined ride, won. Astra, in turn, better and more and more readily, having pleased many good smooth moves and the refinement of designer ideas, because showed a natural reflection of all the advantages of the car. The main thing is that Opel has reached their advantages due to a reasonable price and available configuration. It is worth noting that the Russian assembly played in the case not the most recent role.
Once Volkswagen Golf was an unconditional leader in his class, and the rivals tried to imitate him in every way. But today the market situation is completely different. Modern models Volkswagen are not so reliable, and competitors are clearly approaching. This is clearly visible on the example of the comparison.
Starting
Both cars are assembled quite carefully, but the individual elements of the golf are adjacent more accurately. In addition, its innovative door allows, in case of damage to remove the external lifting for bodywork, which allows to eliminate traces of serious blows. However, this repair is more expensive and complex. Later in the new models Volkswagen moved away from such a solution.
In the crash tests both cars earned five stars, but a detailed comparison of individual items indicates the minimum advantage of Astra.
Astra, like Golf, is carefully protected from corrosion. Weak Opel Place Fragment of the Budget Rear Door under the Chrome Plank. In the golf traces of rust sometimes you can detect on the doors around the windows and on the racks, in the places of touch the door seal.
In terms of the indoor space, a little better is a golf - it provides more space for the rear passengers. The cargo opening of the 5-door Astra is slightly less than that of the golf, but the trunk is more capacious: 380 liters vs 350 l at VW.
The quality of the interior is controversial. The front panel of Astra does not greatly admire with his own species and, unfortunately, in most copies creaks. After a small upgrade in 2007, the quality has improved and finishing versions of Elegance, Cosmo and Sport has already deserved respect. At first glance, inside golf - exemplary: excellent build quality and good materials. But if you look around - it is not perfect. On the power windows and door handles control buttons, rubberized coating. Well-equipped asters prevail in the sale ads. Golfs tend to have more modest equipment, but cost more.
Taking into account all the "for" and "against", in the first round, it is difficult to determine the obvious winner. Both cars deserve a draw.
Score for Astra
Opel Astra has a very simple suspension: on the front axle system MacPherson, to the back - torsion beam. In the front levers, the ball and silent blocks can be changed separately. There is almost nothing to break in the back of the beam. All points over "and" puts the big ground clearance. Thanks to all this advantages, Astra is ideal for our terrible roads. The service life of the ball and other connecting elements is not too big, but the replacement of them is simple and cheap. The only exception is sports asters with IDS + system, i.e. With shock absorbers of adjustable stiffness. Replaysters are absent, and the cost of original parts is estimated by tens of thousands of rubles. But, fortunately, this is headache only owners of sports versions. The rest can sleep well.
The front pendant of the golf also does not cause any serious problems. Rear installed multi-dimensional suspension. Its construction is quite strong, but used copies of the initial production period will most likely require the suspension to put the suspension, for which it might take about 6,000 to 7,000 rubles.
Golf is equipped with an electric steering amplifier, Astra - electro-hydraulic. Both systems are quite reliable, but in the event of unforeseen faults, a wallet can be empty by 10,000 rubles.
In comparison, the chassis wins Astra.
Motorized dilemma
The line of power aggregates of the golf is impressive by their abundance. Unfortunately, the overwhelming majority of available engines have a modern and advanced design that requires increased maintenance and repair costs. Under the notation of FSI and TSI hides the system of direct gasoline injection. For motorists who read with expenses, only three engines can be recommended: an immortal gasoline 1.6-liter 8-valve unit, diesel 1.9 TDI (though it works too loud) and, in extreme cases, a gasoline 1.4-liter 16-valve motor (nothing is particularly impressive, but it does not bother with problems).
Astra engines line also makes an impression, but here the overwhelming majority of motors can be taken into account. A good choice will be turbodiesel borrowed from Fiat - 1.9 CDTI: powerful, economical and quite reliable. 1.7 CDTI ISUZU development is not ideal, but many owners are still satisfied with them. 1.3 CDTI is also borrowed from Fiat: it consumes very little fuel, but much better coofers with easier Corsa.
Note: Most diesel opels have a solid particle filter. Its presence can be determined by the sticker on the central rack from the passenger side. If a value of 0.5 is displayed in the last string of characters - it means the filter is present. If 1.2 and more - it means there is no. Due to the fact that filters on Opel models create a lot of problems during operation, some drivers are removed.
Opel Astra gasoline engines are famous for high fuel consumption, medium performance and good oil appetite. However, they do not deliver serious problems. Typical malfunctions are associated with valve recycling of exhaust gases EGR, throttle valve and oil leakage. After restyling, the manufacturer abandoned the use of valve hydraulic components (concerns strong versions of 1.6 and 1.8 liters). You can check this by decryping the VIN number.
At this comparative stage, Astra is defeated, although it is worth recognizing that two good golf engines (1.6 8V and 1.9 TDI) are quite enough.
Question price
And so we approached the most important issue - the price. Astra is definitely cheaper. Is it worth overpaying? In the end, the best choice will be more expensive Golf with an unpretentious and durable 8-valve 1.6-liter gasoline engine.
Preferring diesel, it is better to cross over stereotypes and pick up Astra 1.9 CDTI without a smbed filter. This will be a well-equipped car, as a rule, in a much better condition than comparable golf.
Summary
Opel Astra is less perfect in technical terms than Volkswagen Golf. Nevertheless, she is recognized as the winner. Astra is cheaper and requires less operational cost. Drivers, often moving on broken roads, will have to taste her hardy suspension. In addition, during the trips, they will appreciate its escaped, tracked and not very noisy 1.9-liter diesel.
Volkswagen Golf V (2003-2008)
History of the model
2003 - Presentation
2004 - the appearance of version 4motion
2005 - Golf Plus
2006 - Crossgolf.
2007 - Golf Combi
:
Defects of block heads and nozzles in engines 2.0 TDI
Wearing the control system of the position of blades in turbocharger with variable geometry
Problems with the timing chain and the coolant pump in 1.4 TSI
Problems with valve recycling system of exhaust gases EGR
Premature wear of the two-mask flywheel
Advantages:
Reliability
Small loss of value
Availability of a large number of diverse spare parts
Minuses :
High Cost Service Cost FSI, TSI and 2.0 TDI PD
Scooty basic equipment
Engines
Most preferred old, time-tested engines - gasoline 8-valve 1.6 l with a capacity of 102 hp And Diesel 1.9 TDI with 105 hp pump-nozzles. The 1.4-liter 16-valve gasoline engine is too weak, while others require large maintenance costs. Version with 2.0 TDI PD is not recommended.
Specifications Volkswagen Golf V (2003-2008)
|
Version |
1.4 16V |
1.6 8V. |
1.9 TDI |
2.0 TDI |
|
Engine |
petrol |
petrol |
turbodiesel |
turbodiesel |
|
Working volume |
1390 cm3 |
1595 cm3 |
1896 cm3 |
1968 cm3 |
|
R4 / 16. |
R 4/8. |
R 4/8. |
R4 / 8 or 16 |
|
|
Maximum power |
80 hp |
102 hp |
105 hp |
140 hp |
|
Maximum torque |
132 Nm |
148 Nm |
250 nm |
320 nm |
|
Dynamics |
||||
|
Maximum speed |
166 km / h |
184 km / h |
187 km / h |
205 km / h |
|
Acceleration 0-100 km / h |
13.9 seconds |
11.4 seconds |
11.3 seconds |
9.3 sec |
Opel Astra III (2004-2012)
History of model:
2004 - Presentation
2006 - TWINTOP convertible
2008 - Sedan version
Typical problems and malfunctions:
Wear dampers in the intake manifold of diesel 1.9 CDTI. The cost of the new collector is about 9,000 rubles.
Refusal of the EGR system - relates to gasoline and diesel engines
CIM module malfunction
Elevated oil consumption engines 1.6 and 1.8 liters
Advantages:
Large selection of cars on the market
Very attractive prices
Wide gamma engines
Good accessibility spare parts
Minuses :
The average reliability of gasoline engines
Slightly worse corrosion protection than Volkswagen Golf
Many cars from corporate park
Engines
Gasoline engines are not impressive not by productivity not fuel consumption. After restyling, the manufacturer abandoned the valve gap hydrocompators. Diesel motors are good, especially 1.9 CDTI. Note - Among diesel versions, solid particle filter occurs.
Specifications Opel Astra III (2004-2012)
|
Version |
1.4 T P. |
1.6 T P. |
1.7 CDTI |
1.9 CDTI |
|
Engine |
petrol |
petrol |
turbodiesel |
turbodiesel |
|
Working volume |
1364 cm3 |
1598 cm3 |
1686 cm3 |
1910 cm3 |
|
Cylinders / Valve Location |
R4 / 16. |
R4 / 16. |
R4 / 16. |
R 4/8. |
|
Maximum power |
90 hp |
115 hp |
110 hp |
120 hp |
|
Maximum torque |
125 Nm |
155 nm |
260 Nm |
280 Nm |
|
Dynamics |
||||
|
Maximum speed |
178 km / h |
191 km / h |
185 km / h |
194 km / h |
|
Acceleration 0-100 km / h |
13.7 seconds |
11.7 seconds |
11.6 seconds |
10.5 seconds |
|
Middle fuel consumption in l / 100 km |
||||
08.03.2017
Opel Astra 3.) - Third generation of a car of a German company. Astra has always been a popular model, but this generation was particularly pleased with sales dealers. Recently, the number of used Opel Astra H has increased dramatically, it is certainly to bind with a natural updating of machines, as most motorists make it every 4-5 years. But, maybe so that the owners begin to get rid of their cars after running 100-150 thousand km . And, what is the true reason, and what disadvantages are peculiar to this car, now we will try to figure it out.
A bit of history:
Debut Opel Astra h took place in 2003 at the auto show in Frankfurt, and already in March 2004 the serial assembly of the car began. In the markets of different countries, he also produced under the names of Chevrolet Astra, Chevrolet Vectra, Holden Astra, Saturn Astra and Vauxhall Astra. The novelty was called upon to change, popular at the time, Opel Vectra B. Total for the storming of the segment " C."Or, as it is still customary, golf class, four bodies based on the Delta platform developed by General Motors - three and five-door hatchback, sedan, wagon and coupe.
For most CIS markets, the car was gathered at the Russian Avtotor Plant in Kaliningrad, and since 2008, at the General Motors motor assembled factory in Shushary under St. Petersburg. The design of the car was developed by the director of the German Designer Studio Opel in Rüsselsheim - Friedhel Enler, he is the creator of Opel Corsa. The production of the model ceased in 2009, Opel Astra J, but, even after the release of a new model, did not decrease the popularity of Opel Astra h, therefore, it was decided to extend the production of this model (the car was made until 2014 called Astra Family).
Weak places and disadvantages of Opel Astra H with mileage
Unlike most competitors, Opel Astra H has a sufficiently high-quality paint and varnish coating. The exceptions turned out to be cars produced in Poland, paint was intimidated on such copies and fell off slices, good, the manufacturer eliminated all the flaws under warranty. The body is completely galvanized, thanks to this, it is not bad to oppose the onslaught of red sickness, but still, over time, from the effects of reagents that our roads are sprinkled, it is possible to detect corrosion foci on the trunk doors, edges of doors and thresholds. On cars of the first years of release, the headlights are muttered, too, can also dine the handles of the rear doors.
Engines
For Opel Astra H, a large number of power units were available: gasoline - 1.4 (90 hp), 1.6 (105 hp), 1.8 (125 hp) and 2.0 (170, 200 hp) ; Diesel - 1.3 (90 hp), 1.7 (100 hp), 1.9 (120 and 150 hp). All motors are quite reliable, but, after 100,000 km, mileage require minor investments. Motor 1.4 has established itself, but, due to insufficient power, this power unit does not use in demand among motorists. In more common motors 1.6 and 1.8, in our operating conditions, the catalyst and the EGR valve is very quickly contaminated. The problem is particularly relevant for cars operated in the metropolis. One of the most serious breakdowns, with which many Astra had to face, is the stubborn gears of intake and graduation camshaft. This trouble takes place on the range of 60-80 thousand km, and after repair there are no guarantees that it will not happen again. Signs of availability will serve: increased noise when starting the engine (grinding, roar) and deterioration in the dynamics.
Also, the main disadvantages include a small resource of the rear engine support (it comes to disrepair every 60-70 thousand km). Often, the owners face a malfunction of the ignition system module, the cause of the ailment lies in a bad contact in the connectors and a late replacement of spark plugs. A closer to 2,50000 km takes a break of the membrane responsible for the recirculation of crankcase gases, is in the valve lid. It is possible to determine the problem by unstable engine operation, as well as on a sizum smoke from the exhaust system. Very often, the services are sentenced to overhaul, however, the problem is solved by replacing the valve cover. The most powerful power unit, in most cases, does not require repair up to 150,000 km, but, small troubles, such as fogging the head of the cylinder block and leakage of oil through the crankshaft gland may occur and after 20,000 miles of run.
All motors are equipped with a timing belt drive, according to the regulations, the belt replacement was prescribed once every 90,000 km, but there were cases of belt cliff after 50000 km, therefore, it is better not to risk and change the belt every 60,000 km. POMP usually changes on each second belt replacement. Diesel engines are reliable, but, demanding on fuel quality and lubricant materials. From disadvantages of diesel engines, we need to note weak fuel equipment and a small resource of the particulate filter (replacement every 50-60 thousand km). If the filter is clogged - the thrust disappears, and Chad is out of the exhaust system, like from an old Kamaz. Also, due to constructive miscalculations, the engine control unit suffers (exposed to moisture and dirt). Of the most expensive problems faced by the owners of diesel cars - the failure of a two-massed flywheel (resource 100-150 thousand km). Signals about the presence of the problem will serve a knock and vibration when switching gear, it is worth noting that the transmissions are turned on clearly.
Transmission
The choice of customers Opel Astra H was proposed three types of gearboxes - mechanical, automatic and robot "Easytronic". The most trouble-free mechanics are considered, even the clutch kit serves 100-120 thousand km. The only thing that can be reproached by the manual transmission is only for the lack of synchronizers, because of this, the reverse transmission is not always correctly included. From the disadvantages faced by the owners of cars with mechanics, you can select the rear seal of the crankshaft and a small resource of the bearing of the secondary shaft (60-80 thousand km). On some instances after 70,000 miles, cracks appear on the box seam. If, when switching from the first on the third transmission, a blow is felt, it will be better to contact the service, but, in most cases, it is enough to change the oil to eliminate the alend.
The automatic transmission is famous for jerks and twitching during shifting gear, but they are not worth it, because it is not a breakdown, but the feature of the transmission. The most common automatic transmission problem is a coolant leak in the hydroconuts of the box, after which the unit fails. If authonately fails, the gibber cleaning in the box will help. When switching to alarm, the box works only on the fourth gear. Robotic transmission, very capricious and requires attention to every 15,000 km of run (even adjustment of the clutch).
During operation, the slave disk is erased, while the point of contact with the basket is shifted, but the controller responsible for the supply of fuel does not know about the shift of the point of contact and supplies an incorrect amount of fuel. As a result, this leads to incorrect work of the box and premature clutch wear. It is worth noting that even with timely servicing of a robotic transmission, its resource in rare cases exceeds 150,000 km. Before buying a car with a robot, be sure to ride on it, if there are strong jerks when switching, it is better to refuse to buy such a car.
Reliability of Opel Astra H
The simplicity is the guarantee of reliability, it is according to this principle and a suspension of this model was developed, a semi-dependent torsion beam was installed behind, McPherson. If we talk about driving characteristics, the suspension copes well with the realities of our roads, but is distinguished by increased noise. If you do not take into account the racks and bushings of the stabilizer (resource 20-40 thousand km), the weakest place of chassis is considered support bearings, and steering traction, their resource, in most cases, does not exceed 60,000 miles of mileage. Hub bearings (ABS sensor comes into disrepair after 50,000 km) and ball supports at average loads are loaded 50-70 thousand km. The remaining suspension elements serve 100,000 km and more.
The weakest place in the steering mechanism is the steering rail, as a rule, begins to knock after 100,000 km of run, also a fluid leak may appear, this, with time, can lead to the destruction of the node, but if you have to notice and eliminate the problem, complications in time to avoid. There is no complaints about the reliability of the brake system, the only thing that the owners complain is, it is for a small resource of the front pads (30000 km.).
Salon
Salon Opel Astra H is made in a simple style, but, at the same time, the manufacturer used enough quality materials, but despite this, the crickets in the cabin have almost every car. The car and the reliability of the electrical equipment of the cabin can not boast. The main problem in electronics is the incorrect operation of the buttons on the steering wheel and stealless control levers, the reason is a faulty SIM-module of the steering column. There are complaints and to the climate system management system, and, more precisely, to the air recycling flap. There is a problem with a characteristic crackle from under the console.
Outcome:
In terms of reliability Opel AstraH.not much different from its competitors, but, thanks to the low cost of maintenance and repair, this car is one of the most interesting golf class representatives in the secondary market.
If you are the owner of this car model, please describe the problems that you have to face during the operation of the car. Perhaps it is your feedback that will help readers of our site when choosing a car.
Respect, editors Car auto
As part of the opening of the automotive exhibition in the capital of Switzerland, Geneva (Geneva Motor Show 2019) traditionally announced the results of the annual competition - Car of the Year. The main award this year got the Hatchback Opel Astra, which is a representative of the General Motors concern.This "hatch" was able to dial more than 309 points on the results of the vote, ahead of its nearest pursuer in the face of the VOLVO XC90 crossover. The first triple in the contest "Car of the Year" in Europe closed the router Mazda MX-5 - 202 test points.
Until the final of this annual car contest in 2019, also reached the Audi A4, who scored 189 points, Jaguar Xe with 163 credkh points, Skoda Superb with 147 points, as well as the BMW 7-Series sedan new generation - 143 points.
The main prize for the model Opel Astra received the head of the company - Karl-Thomas Neuman.
Recall that following the results of last year's competition "Car of the Year" in Europe, Volkswagen Passat became the winner in the main nomination. Previously, this prestigious premium won Peugeot 308, Volkswagen Golf, as well as Opel Ampera, Nissan Leaf and Volkswagen Polo.
Tags: What is better Opel Astra or Volkswagen Polo Sedan What is better
Just a consumer approach to the car, on nishtychychychykam and yummy, I do not go crazy, but I use stupidly ...
Tell me what is better and why: Volkswagen Polo or Opel Astra H? Machines new. | Topic: Lydia
Nikolay to compare these cars, actually, incorrectly, as polo refers to the class "b" Boris, and Astra refers to the class "C" Yaroslav. That is, in fact, the polo must be compared with the corsa, and the Astra with a golf, and with this comparison, the VF models won, since the equally high maintainability of FV is hopefully and more attention is paid to the comforts of comfort. Accordingly, FV will be more expensive.
If you still compare Polo and Astra, I would advise, firstly, you personally take on the test drive both cars. Secondly, see the Astrus with the engine 1.6 - it is better suited for this model. Well, in third, if you plan to ride mostly alone, then you can take polo, and if with a company / family - then the Astra taxes.
Victor Monopenseal, IMHO!
Lyudmila of course Astra is higher class, and checked ...
Inna Astra .... I sell
Elena taste and color as they say .. Both eco-class cars. My friend is now a new Polo Sedan - I know about his shortcomings. I think there is no special difference, there is a matter of taste.
Cyril Oh, of course Astra.
Olga personally I did not like Astra - I looked many different in the cabin ...
In addition to polo, I really liked Cerato and Lancer10, but it's the other money ...
Artem Voltsvagen of course, even though they are both German, but the reputation in the market in Russia is higher, and hopefully they
Anna on the appearance of Astra 100 times more beautiful
I do not understand "internal" -
Ruslan want to take an arrest itself ... only not H, A G. H - Great Machine
Egor at the current action - the cost of these cars, definitely better than Astra samurnie. It is so better, but considering that with similar grades for the same money, the Astra Sedan has a more powerful 140 liter engine. from. Against 105 and, especially, a large salon and trunk.
Comparison: Astra and Polo - Logbook Opel Astra Cosmo + 1.8 ...
Opel Astra Sedan 1.8 Automatic, Suite equipment, new price - 770 thousand. ... Astra is noticeably better than the audio system - 7 columns against 4 polo.
External update Opel Corsa
Above the new appearance, designers worked, fixing all previous shortcomings. The corpus has become an elongated and catchy, while the desire movement does not occupy him. The design of this car covers all classes of the population. It is perfect for a young couple, business people or pensioners. The first thing that the designers changed is the lower grille it has become longer and wider. The headlights together with all the hull stretched to the top and became wider.
Also designers took care of safety, reduced the corner of the refraction of the hood and windshield.
Salon Opel Corca.
The place in the cabin is not so much, but cozy and everything is at hand. The dashboard besides the speedometer and the tachometer, contains a small display with backlight to read which is convenient for any weather. The rest of the control modules are on the steering wheel and to the right of it, there is a 5-inch touch screen in full configuration. Despite the compactness, in the cabin is convenient even to the high driver. Basic equipment pleases comfort, it includes: airbags, air conditioning, radio tape recorder, trunk with double ground and electric windows glasses.
In any configuration, the engine is only one. The volume of 1.4 liters, the power of 100 horsepower, acceleration to 100 km / h takes 12 seconds. For urban hatchback, this is completely enough, taking into account the cost of 6 liters per 100 km. The main "chip" of this model is fuel economy and reducing emissions of harmful substances into the atmosphere.
Exterior Opel Astra
Astra also did not fall behind in the update design and in 2014 appeared before us in a new appearance. To the new model "Priose", the trunk increases in volume by 50 liters, but the "prison" organically and those who have not seen old models will not notice this change. The basis for the hull was taken by a wagon and upgraded it under the sedan. The front headlights changed, became more aggressive and sports.
Interior Opel Astra.
Here is the salon and there is a real "trump card" of this model. Basically changed the quality of materials, and improved the quality of the assembly. It was unpleasant when the car was fully suitable for you, and the plastic on the torpedo was so terrible that he beat off all the desire. Now everything is different, plastic mild m pleasant texture. The Torpeda Center takes a color touchscreen display that "smart" performs music, video or navigation playback tasks. The seats are comfortable, scan is soft and pleasant to the touch, only the rear sofa is small, three adults people freely feel, there will not be there.
Two options of gasoline engines will arrive at our market:
- 1.6 liter volume, 115 horsepower power - a simple urban version in the basic configuration
- Volume of 1.8 liters, power of 135 horsepower, and automatic gearbox
Both configurations are perfectly moving in the city movement and on the highway. It already depends on the personally preferences of the capacity, whether you need a machine that will be gubed so that the tires are burning or smooth overclocking to the optimal speed.
Opel Corsa is excellent updated hatchback, pleases with its interior and technological capabilities, as well as an economical engine. Opel Astra is significantly more, both outside and inside and looks great in the role of a family car.
Watch an interesting video on this topic.
