Last year, Skoda Rapid was owned by a little less than 30,000 people. Did our compatriots simply underestimate the Czech liftback? Indeed, for 1,000,000 Russian rubles that have become stronger, you can buy real European quality on wheels, and even with excellent handling.
Perhaps the Korean auto industry has already outdone it? found the answers to all these questions during a comparative test drive.
EXTERIOR
The new "Rio", which is commendable, does not copy any of the older brothers. Of course, he is not deprived of a tiger's grin, but this beast smiles in an original modest way. In much the same way that ex-Volkswagen designer Peter Schreier does for the joy of joining KIA.
Taxi drivers who dream of leasing the first foreign car of the country open their mouths much more. And what - from the LED sections in the optics, and at the back - connected by a single line to match BMW, not only the mood rises, but also something else. Plus the stylish design of rims and tinted rear windows - not a car, but a dream! Although quite ordinary.
After the update "Rapid" became brighter, more aggressive and meaner - contrasting edging of side mirrors, stylish linings and inserts definitely give the car a touch of sportiness. Yes, that is already there: in the Monte Carlo version, with its fashionable moldings, spoiler and lip, the car attracts the eyes of even those who gave credit for the previous half of their lives.
Against the background of Skoda, the Korean sedan looks rather boring, but without pretensions to inconsistency - sport and audacity in Rapid is no more than the beauty of a girl without makeup.
INTERIOR ERGONOMICS
The Koreans are clearly borrowing the right ideas from the representatives of the German auto industry, and they do it very carefully. You will not see any "copy-paste" - everything is decorated with its own sauce, and the level of ergonomics is as high as Mount Ararat.
True, she still cannot reach the height of Elbrus - the chairs lack lumbar support and a profile for a comfortable shoulder position. And the steering wheel is so slippery as if it was oiled with oil, which is used in their stories by heroines of adult films. But here it will be no less hot than watching these same films - everything and everyone is heated in the Rio, including the rear seats and the windshield.
At Skoda, the warm options lose the ability to warm up the steering wheel. But the seats are profiled so clearly that the riders in them will not get tired at all, even if they have to travel from Russia to the Czech Republic.
The layout of the interior is thought out to the smallest detail - even if the "Volkswagen" patterns are still boring, but you can't find fault with ergonomics. Perhaps only the instrument panel is perceived in the Rio less heavy, but otherwise - shine.
As for the interior space, the back row passengers in Skoda will be much more comfortable - the gallery riders in KIA will have to make room. But the ceiling in a Korean sedan does not press the heads of the inhabitants of the sofa as critically as the roof of a Czech liftback. But the luggage compartment Rapid has a clear advantage - not only in terms of volume (530 liters versus 480 liters), but also in terms of layout convenience.
RIDING WEARING
If you can get used to the appearance and features of the interior decoration of each of these cars, well, or continue to argue endlessly about their pros and cons, then in terms of driving performance, priorities are set quite quickly.
In disciplines "taxiing" and "behavior on the road" Skoda Rapid is recognized as an impeccable leader. The Czech steering wheel is as precise as a Swiss watch, and the chassis settings allow you to turn into corners with enthusiasm and minimal heel. But the car dampens the shocks from the remnants of our roads harshly, although neatly.
In this regard, it is more comfortable - the suspension smoothly and smoothly smoothes out irregularities that are ubiquitous in Russian directions. True, the "Korean" loves swing, and his "steering wheel" - lightness.
But he does not pause for a smoke break at a sharp start from a standstill, as required by the Czech liftback - the sedan accelerates smoothly and without jerks, and immediately after pressing the right pedal. Still, the traditional six-speed hydromechanical "automatic" is the best alternative to the nervous robotic "seven-speed". And - judging by the experience of the owners - more reliable.
However, in sport mode, Rapid responds to the pilot's requests with lightning speed - 125 turbocharged stallions are able to satisfy. In terms of acceleration time to a hundred, it overtakes the "Rio" with aspirated 123 "horses" by more than two seconds.
In Skoda winners and in terms of fuel consumption - in the combined cycle, the liftback swallows about nine liters, and its rival - almost 11 liters. Despite the fact that in the performance characteristics of both cars, completely different figures appear: 5.5 liters versus 7.1 liters. But the brakes of the Korean sedan work more smoothly than the sharp "Rapid" mechanisms. But the soundproofing of the "state employee" from the Czech Republic is clearly more effective.
As comrade Ogurtsov from “Carnival Night” said, “a huge work has been done, I am satisfied with the team, but then, comrades, this will not work.” After all, with the change of generation, sales of Solaris fell by a quarter! He was the absolute leader and slipped to fourth place. As we expected in (ЗР, No. 5, 2017), Rio of the previous generation immediately picked up the fallen banner: increased sales by 17% and became the leader. It is cheaper, so the people reached out.
What's the new Rio? Grew up and went up in price. We took version 1.6 with a gun and in the maximum version of Premium - this Rio is offered for 989,900 rubles. Similarly equipped Solaris is even more expensive: 1,035,900 rubles. But the updated Rapid 1.4 DSG, which we invited to the test, in the maximum Style performance, easily took this bar: for a car with a lot of options like bi-xenon headlights, you have to pay 1,144,100 rubles. Three years ago, for that kind of money, you could take a well-equipped Octavia ...
Classics and rock and roll
All three cars represent the mainstream budget segment, but this did not affect the chassis settings. They know how to play "checkers", and it's not just about taxis. As with Hyundai, I got to work on fine-tuning the chassis of the new Rio. And if you can still find differences in the design and in some little things between them, then in the suspension settings they are absolute twins, and the tires determine the meager difference in sensations. The developers initially wanted to give the Kia Rio a more sporty character. But the porridge can still be spoiled with butter. Therefore, in the end, it was reasonable to leave the same driving settings as in Hyundai, since the new Solaris in terms of handling approached almost the class standard.
So the Rio with the change of generation made a huge leap towards the stability of the relationship between the rear suspension and the body, especially on. It was enough to put the rear shock absorbers vertically, and there was no trace of the former stern wagging. The sedan willingly dives into the arc, and the electric power steering supplies the steering wheel with a synthetic, but timely weight. Like the Solaris, the Kia's steering wheel is slightly overweight at zero, but that doesn't spoil the overall impression.
Skoda is also not a miss! In a protracted turn it holds on to a trajectory that is not "budget-friendly" for a long time. In the limit, it recklessly shows a tendency to oversteer, which, as expected, turns into a skid, it is worth turning the steering wheel abruptly. Rapid also disables the stabilization system. Although it works wonderfully well, preventing entry into dangerous corners when the wheels break.
On a straight line, Skoda is stable, does not react to a crosswind and a track at all. Kia and Hyundai require periodic course adjustments, but their reactions to the steering wheel are sharper. Despite the nuances, the handling of all cars is reliable. What a mass consumer needs!
Traction armament has always been the strong point of the Rio. The situation has not changed now: a 123 ‑ horsepower Gamma series motor paired with a proven six-speed hydromechanics is quite enough for everyday driving. But for "shooting" the pedal needs to be pressed more actively, because the peak of torque has sat down at almost 5000 rpm, and at the bottom the engine is frankly sleeping. Fortunately, the machine switches quickly, subtly feeling the moment - both time and traction.
Solaris has the same box, but it seems like she was not given her quick wits. The ride is reminiscent of Linkin Park songs: a calm verse explodes on acceleration with a screaming engine chorus. The automatic machine flatly refuses to downshift until you press the pedal to the floor. Moreover, this damping cannot be cured - there is no sports mode. But Solaris stops more delicately, allowing you to finely dose the slowdown. The Rio's drive is tuned sharper and already in the initial phase creates a decent pressure in the hydraulic system. As a result, you have to get used to the gentle pedal in order to avoid "pecking" when braking.
The braking distance of the Skoda is a little longer, but you can't deny it the information content of the pedal. But with its power-to-weight ratio, Rapid puts everyone on fire. If Rio and Solaris just overclock well, then Rapid's dynamics are almost a reference for the class. And it's not only about the maximum acceleration, but also about the convenience of controlling the acceleration dynamics.
The Korean Gamma engine sings at very high notes, and the Skoda TSI feels confident throughout the entire rev range, since two hundred Newton-meters of torque are available almost from the very bottom. Classic "six-shot" automatic machines "Asians" are powerless in front of the DSG preselection, "shooting" seven gears from two shafts at once. As a result, Rapid is able to quickly dissolve Solaris with Rio in its small mirrors. But will the DSG last without repairs as long as conventional machines live? Question!
ATMOSPHERE OF MONTE CARLOAs good as the all-Volkswagen TSI turbo engine, the atmospheric Rapid rules the market ball. At the time of the comparative test, it was not possible to get such a car, and I went to Greece to meet with the atmospheric renewed Rapid. The tandem of an aspirated 1.6 MPI and a classic six-speed automatic is excellent. Of course, such a car cannot keep up with the turbo-Rapid, especially in the highlands: due to oxygen starvation, the aspirated engine completely "sits down". However, against the background of the Solaris / Rio pair, her sprint capabilities are quite convincing. Skoda has at its disposal 13 "horses" less, but in acceleration to 100 km / h it is almost as good as the "Koreans". And it's not only a brisk box, but also a higher torque: 155 N ∙ m versus 151 N ∙ m, and a maximum of 1000 rpm is reached earlier. The conclusion is simple: if you do not plan to regularly race with traffic lights, atmospheric Rapid with six-speed hydromechanics is more than enough. I also got to know Monte Carlo. I rarely pay attention to different special versions, but the Rapid, dedicated to the famous Rally Monte Carlo, caught on. It can be identified by the bumper covers, sills and other wheels. But much more important are the bi-xenon headlights, a perforated leather three-spoke steering wheel with a beveled rim and bucket seats with integrated head restraints: they hold perfectly and, thanks to a good profile, give reliable support to the shoulders, which is just what standard seats lack. Rapid Monte Carlo can be taken even with a basic 90-horsepower engine, such a car is estimated at 847,000 rubles. For a 110-strong version with a gun, you have to pay 950,000 rubles. And the turbine option will cost almost a million. I would take Monte Carlo: excellent light, comfortable steering wheel and seat for me are much more important than rear-view cameras and climate control. |
Shake quietly!
Whether you like it or not, Rapid must be upset in front of potholes: the suspension responds harshly to rebound. Skoda does not really stand on ceremony with the road trifle - you feel all the joints! Rio and Solaris are nobler in these flaws. But if the suspension works confidently on rebound, then catching a blow during compression is easy. Therefore, it is better to slow down in front of “speed bumps” and similar hard bumps. Of course, all three cars cannot be ranked as bone shakers, but they are far from such masters of digestion of terrible roads as Lada Vesta and Renault Logan.
The Skoda turbo engine is much quieter than the younger aspirated 1.6 110 hp, but its voice solo in the general background noise at low and medium speeds. And when the arrow of the speedometer exceeds 100 km / h, aerodynamic noise comes to the fore, especially strong in the area of \u200b\u200bthe mirrors. However, they are not annoying. Road noise also does not exceed the unpleasant threshold at all speeds and surfaces. What can not be said about Solaris.
| Rapid holds on to the trajectory more confidently than the Korean pair and allows you to go through a "tared" corner 10-15 km / h faster. Rapid holds on to the trajectory more confidently than the Korean pair and allows you to go through a "tared" corner 10-15 km / h faster. |
||
The bottom of Hyundai is treated with additional "noise", but the hum from the tires is the same as in frankly budget cars. Okay, we can blame it on the fact that we have Solaris from the first batch, which did not undergo additional processing of the rear wheel arches. But how to explain the vibrations at idle with the fan and compressor on? The steering wheel, driver's seat and gear selector are cramping at these moments.
Surprisingly, the Rio doesn't have such problems. Although, opening the hoods, we made sure that visually the engines shake the same way. However, only a subtle itch reaches the Kia's controls. Could it be the engine mounts? But they, judging by the catalog number, are the same. This was confirmed by the factory workers. Miracles!
Kia is also imperfect, but definitely better: the underbody and rear wheel arches are processed from the very beginning. The result is “on the ears”.
Crossroads
The related Rio and Solaris have not become complete twins. Solaris slows down better and has a better face. Kia has a better tuned box, lower vibration levels. However, the differences are so insignificant that we gave the machines the same marks.
However, something suggests that Kia will perform brighter in the market. Basic Solaris is cheaper, but inferior in equipment. So, Rio is equipped with air conditioning by default - for many, this is a weighty argument. And the most popular version with a gun and in the average version Comfort is almost 30 thousand cheaper.
Rapid before them in terms of sales - to drive and not catch up. And the fact that in today's fight he came out the winner will hardly help. It's not about price at all. After all, if you abandon the options, the price tag will drop to the Korean level. At the same time, Rapid has an excellent engine, a fast transmission and a spacious interior. Everything with him! So why are Rio and Solaris more popular? Apparently, Koreans know some special secrets of the game of market checkers, which have long since turned into chess.
The editors would like to express their gratitude to the Ekodolye residential complex for help in organizing the shooting
DATA OF MANUFACTURERS
| HYUNDAI SOLARIS | KIA RIO | SKODA RAPID |
|
| Curb / full weight | 1198/1610 kg | 1198/1610 kg | 1227/1732 kg |
| Acceleration time 0-100 km / h | |||
| Maximum speed | |||
| Fuel / fuel reserve | AI-92, AI-95/50 l | AI-92, AI-95/50 l | |
| Fuel consumption: urban / suburban / mixed cycle | 8.9 / 5.3 / 6.6 l / 100 km | 8.9 / 5.3 / 6.6 l / 100 km | 7.1 / 4.4 / 5.5 l / 100 km |
| ENGINE |
|||
| petrol | petrol | petrol |
|
| Location | front, transverse | front, transverse | front, transverse |
| Configuration / number of valves | |||
| Working volume | |||
| Power | 90 kW / 123 HP at 6300 rpm | 92 kW / 125 HP at 5000-6000 rpm |
|
| Torque | 151 N ∙ m at 4850 rpm | 151 N ∙ m at 4850 rpm | 200 N ∙ m at 1400-4000 rpm |
| TRANSMISSION |
|||
| type of drive | front | front | front |
| Transmission | |||
| Gear ratios: | 4,40 / 2,73 / 1,83 / 1,39 / 1,00 / 0,77 / - / 3,44 | 3,50 / 2,09 / 1,34 / 0,97 / 0,93 / 0,78 / 0,65 / 3,72 |
|
| main gear | 4.80 (I-IV); 3.43 (V-VII) |
||
| CHASSIS |
|||
| Suspension: Front / Rear | McPherson / elastic crossbeam | ||
Class B sedans are the most popular models in the local market. In connection with the crisis of 2014, there was a sharp one.Therefore, the former leaders of the C class, such as the Ford Focus, which previously cost an average of 500 thousand rubles, have now risen in price to at least 800 thousand. In these conditions, the popularity of more compact sedans has increased, although their cost increased, reaching the previous level of prices of models of class C. And yet now such cars are sold in the largest quantities. One of the leaders of the local market is Kia Rio. Many other models are also very popular. Among them is the Skoda Rapid. Next, we consider "Kia Rio" or "Skoda Rapid": which is better and how to choose the right one.
Origin
The Kia Rio is a Korean small class model, produced since 2000. The first two generations of the car were identical for different markets, but the third, which appeared in 2011, was decided to be split. Therefore, the model sold in the local market differs significantly from the machines presented in Europe and North America. This is due to the fact that a modification for the Chinese market, called K2, was adopted as the basis for the Russian Rio. In fact, this is the same car with minor changes for local conditions. The model is based on the updated Hyundai Accent platform. In 2015, she underwent a restyling.
Skoda Rapid is a relatively new Czech model that appeared in 2012. Since Skoda is a division of the Volkswagen Audi Group, the Rapid is based on one of the variants of the common platform of the A0 concern - PQ25. Therefore, many components and assemblies are borrowed from other models.
If you choose from this point of view "Kia Rio" or "Skoda Rapid" (which is better), it looks more preferable as it is not a simplified version for developing countries, but a single model for all markets, albeit a budget one.
Body
Kia Rio is presented in two bodies: a 5-door hatchback (from 2012) and a 4-door sedan (from 2011). Traditionally, the sedan is much more popular in the local market. Its length is 4.38, wheelbase is 2.57 m, width is 1.7, height is 1.47. The hatchback is 0.25 m shorter, the other dimensions are identical. The sedan has a trunk volume of 500 liters, the hatchback has 389 liters.
Skoda Rapid has a liftback body. It resembles a sedan in shape, but the trunk lid is combined with the rear window. The length of the car is 4.48, the wheelbase is 2.6 m, the width is 1.7, the height is 1.47. Trunk volume - 550 l.
To determine on the basis of this, "Kia Rio" or "Skoda Rapid": which is better is difficult. As you can see, the sizes of these models are very close, especially if we consider the Rio sedan. Although the Rapid body is more practical, as it combines the qualities of a sedan and a hatchback.
By design "Kia Rio" or "Skoda Rapid": which is better, the photo will allow you to determine. In general, Kia has a more youthful style, and Skoda is decorated traditionally for the manufacturer's models.
Chassis
Since the Rio is based on the Accent platform, the suspension is the same as this model. That is, the front one is represented by McPherson struts, the rear one is a semi-independent structure. The car is tuned for good behavior on asphalt roads. In this case, the ground clearance is 16 cm, which is provided by a modification for local conditions. The Rio is equipped with 15-inch wheels. The brakes on the front wheels are ventilated discs, the rear ones are drum brakes for 1.4 liters, and disc brakes for 1.6 liters.
The components of the Rapid chassis are borrowed from other models of the manufacturer. So, the front and the rear semi-independent beam are taken from the first generation Octavia from the Fabia. The ground clearance is 17 cm. Wheels with a diameter of 14 to 16 inches are available. The rear brakes of the simplest version are also drum brakes. For other options, all are disk.
According to the chassis, it is also difficult to determine whether "Kia Rio" or "Skoda Rapid" is better. As you can see, the design of the suspensions is identical. The differences are in the settings.
Engines
Rio for the local market is equipped with two power units.
The G4FA is the initial 1.4-liter four-cylinder engine. Its power is 107 liters. sec., torque - 135 Nm.
The G4FD has the same design, but with a larger volume of 0.2 liters. Thanks to this, the power is 16 hp higher. sec., torque - 20 Nm.
Both engines are designed for AI-92 gasoline.
Three powertrains are available for the local version of the Rapid.
CJZC - a four-cylinder engine with distributed injection has a volume of 1.6 liters. Its capacity is 90 liters. sec., torque - 155 Nm.
CJZD - the engine of the same design and volume, but more powerful by 20 liters. from. The torque is the same.
CZEA is a four-cylinder engine with a smaller volume (1.4 liters), but equipped with a turbocharger and a direct injection system. This allows him to develop 125 hp. from. and 200 Nm.
Rapid powertrains are designed for a minimum of 95 gasoline.
"Kia Rio" or "Skoda Rapid": which is better in terms of the range of engines - it is difficult to say unequivocally. Power units of the Korean model are simpler in design, therefore they are less demanding on fuel quality, which ensures lower costs. The range of Rapid engines is slightly wider, which allows buyers to more accurately select a car based on their needs. In addition, this helps to expand their audience, since the engines cover a wider range of characteristics.
So, CJZC is the most economical and approximately corresponds to the 1.4 L Rio engine. The CJZD sits between Kia's engines in performance, but closer to the 1.6L variant. The most powerful Rapid engine, the CZEA, outperforms the 1.6L Korean powertrain.
Transmissions
For the starter Rio motor, 4- and 5-speed automatic and manual transmissions are offered, respectively.
Versions with a 1.6 liter engine are equipped with more modern 6-speed automatic and manual transmissions.
The simplest version of the Rapid is equipped with a 5-speed manual transmission.
For a more powerful 1.6 liter engine, they offer the same manual transmission, as well as a 6-speed automatic.
The most powerful motor is equipped exclusively with a 7-speed robotic DSG gearbox.
"Skoda Rapid" or "Kia Rio": which is better in terms of the range of transmissions is also ambiguous. In general, the Rio has a wider range of gearbox options. It is represented by four gearboxes: 5- and 6-speed automatic and manual. Three transmissions are available for the Rapid: 6-speed automatic, 5-speed manual and 7-speed robotic. At the same time, for two engines (the simplest and most powerful) there is no choice of a gearbox.
In the Rio, each engine is equipped with two gearboxes, although they are still fixed for different trim levels. The main advantage of the Rapid is the presence of a complex robotic DSG, but on the other hand, a more advanced 6-speed manual is available for the Rio than that of the Skoda.
Salon
If we consider the interiors of cars like the Kia Rio or the Skoda Rapid, which is better? The review of cars by journalists gives the most information.
In their opinion, Skoda surpasses Kia in ergonomics, since, unlike it, it has adjustments for the seat height and steering wheel for reach. In addition, the Rapid has niches in the rear for various items.
For the comfort of "Kia Rio" or "Skoda Rapid": which is better? The review also supports Skoda. More Rapid adjustments provide a comfortable front seat. In the back row, with similar dimensions, there is more space in height and width. The backrest of the Skoda's rear seat also has a greater tilt, which improves comfort.
For the quality of the Kia Rio or Skoda Rapid salons: which is better? Feedback from owners and opinions of journalists indicate that the interior of a Korean car is of better quality. They celebrate the best plastics and self-cleaning fabric of the seats.
Performance
The simplest modifications of both cars are almost identical in dynamics. Rio with a manual gearbox accelerates to 100 km / h in 11.6 seconds and is capable of accelerating to 185 km / h. Skoda reaches the same top speed but accelerates 0.2 seconds faster. The second modification of Skoda with a 1.6 liter engine accelerates to 100 km / h in 10.3 s and reaches 195 km / h. In terms of acceleration, it is equal to the most powerful Rio, and even surpasses it in speed by 5 km / h.
It takes 9 seconds to accelerate the fastest turbocharged Skoda to 100 km / h, the maximum speed is 208 km / h.
The Rio's 4-speed gearbox is soft and sluggish, while the Skoda automatic is slower than the Korean 6-speed gearbox. DSG has mostly negative reviews, both in terms of smoothness and reliability. The Rapid manual gearbox does not have 6 gears, which affects the economy.
To the question: "Kia Rio" or "Skoda Rapid": which is better to choose in terms of dynamics? "- you can answer: Skoda with a 1.4 liter engine. The simplest versions are approximately equal, and Rapid with a medium engine actually lags behind 1.6 l Rio, although slightly faster on data.
By handling "Kia Rio" or "Skoda Rapid": which is better? Reviews testify in favor of Skoda. It possesses more informative control bodies, reaction accuracy and stability. The Rio is less accurate and lurches more.
Comfort
The Rapid's good handling is achieved through increased suspension stiffness. The Rio has softer settings, so it smoothes out bumps. However, in some conditions, buildup appears. Also, due to the lack of energy intensity, breakdowns are possible on large irregularities.
In terms of acoustic comfort, the cars are approximately equal.
Profitability
In terms of fuel consumption, the cars are very close. The 1.4 liter Skoda engine stands out, which, according to the data, is slightly more economical. However, the Rapid can only be refueled with 95 gasoline, while the Rio is sufficient for AI-92.
The cost
For the price, the cars are also close. Rapid in the initial version is cheaper (574 thousand rubles, while Rio costs 611.9 thousand). The base cost of the more powerful versions differs much less (only by about 2000). A turbocharged Skoda can be bought at a price of 886 thousand. At the same time, the Rio configuration is richer, and a lot of equipment has to be bought on Rapid.
Outcome
Rapid surpasses the Rio in handling, ergonomics, practicality, space in the back row and dynamics thanks to the presence of a 1.4 liter engine. The Rio is more comfortable, has a better finish and is more economical, thanks to the ability to use 92 gasoline.
At the same time, Rapid lags behind Rio by the number of cars sold by about 3 times. For 9 months of this year, more than 62 thousand Rio and more than 19 thousand Rapids were sold. This puts Rio in third place on the market and Skoda in fourteenth.
It is known that everyone is inclined to choose their own, namely, unique preferences in appearance, purpose, etc. caused a huge variety of cars. However, not everyone makes plans to buy a car based only on visual satisfactory design, performance, equipment, so much more plays a primary role. The selection of cars is based on a similar 1.6-liter engine, but a comparative review of cars should be carried out and the main advantages and disadvantages of each option should be determined.
Assembly
If we take into account the place of assembly of the car for our region, then there is no fundamental difference, since the production of both vehicles is located in Russia. So Skoda Rapid is supplied from Kaluga, and Kia Rio is manufactured in St. Petersburg.
Body type
This is where the interesting begins, if you look at the Kia lineup, the Rio model is sold in a hatchback or sedan body, that is, you have to choose between them. Rapid, on the other hand, has common visual features taken from both types, as it combines a sedan with a hatchback. Such a body is called a liftback, a rather unique design and recognition is provided, but how functional they are, each owner should choose independently.
Exterior
Some differences in external design and size are observed in both cars, but it is difficult to give unambiguous advantages to any side, but rather a matter of taste. The Czech car industry has created a model with strictly accentuated broken lines, visually it should be noted the similarity with Octavia, even not everyone can distinguish them right away. The Korean car industry has the characteristic features of Asian design, it is quite traditional, but there are also some elements of European trends. The design is based on a calm form, with smooth lines, in general, an impression of peace is created. Trends promise a further spread of this direction.
Trunk and capacity
The choice between these cars in terms of capacity can be made with the naked eye. If you look at the Skoda, then there is a large trunk, its capacity reaches 550 liters, and this is subject to the presence of rear backs. The useful volume increases greatly, if you lower them, then you can hold 1500 liters. Paying attention not to the exhibit of the Korean manufacturer, there is a trunk with a volume of 389 liters, which is 30% less than the competitor. The documentation does not indicate the volume with the backrests down, but it is obvious that it will be less.
If we compare the dimensions inside the car, then at first glance, there is no significant difference. Nevertheless, the reviews of tall owners are clearly the preferred choice in favor of the Rapid due to the convenient location of the steering wheel and pedals, when the steering wheel does not interfere with pedaling. Kia Rio does not provide such comfort, you have to choose between the convenience of pressing the accelerator or control.
The body of the Czech car is slightly wider, which allows the driver to get more space in the shoulders. The front panel makes a significant contribution to the appearance of the interior of the "Korean". It is made of high-quality plastic, while sheathed with leatherette, the exterior gives the impression of the high cost of the model. Skoda skimp on plastic, it is not very pleasant to the touch, the impression from use is mediocre, a cheap series of material is immediately noticeable. At the same time, the panel is assembled somewhat slovenly, which creates a slight hum when using it.
Interior
The instrument cluster is more attractive, bright and rich in Kia, which immediately catches the eye. Supervision design with red backlighting that looks spectacular, expensive and aggressive. Skoda went the opposite way, instead of beauty, preference is given to information content and ease of understanding of devices. The visibility of the flap is high in any light, but the appearance is less impressive.
Moving on to the rear seats, there is a little more space on the side of the Skoda, this is extremely important when accommodating tall passengers. It is more spacious in the Skoda Rapid 2016, but neither competitors have much discomfort. Compared to the Kia, the recline angle at the back is slightly higher, which transfers more load from the passenger's back to the seat and provides a better level of comfort. Also in the back of the Skoda there are lamps, several cup holders, the usual handles on the ceiling, and pockets in the doors. For the Korean car, they made a single lamp and a cup holder, and there are no pockets at all, another small drawback is that the glass on the door does not fully drop. In contrast to the disadvantages of the Kia, the seats are lined with material prone to self-cleaning. Also, the car, when transporting 3 passengers in the back, has more convenience, since there is no tunnel in the center.
Equipment
Immediately, we note that the more technologically advanced is the Kia Rio. The car has alloy wheels, built-in a large number of airbags (6 pcs.). You can enjoy climate control, the audio system has a pleasant, clear sound. Fog lights are built in, and there is a luxury for the glasses - electric heating. To get the same characteristics, Skoda should overpay and buy a more expensive configuration. Standard includes 2 cushions, wheels are in a stamped disc.
Clearance. This indicator is approximately the same, almost indistinguishable in appearance. The technical documentation reports for Skoda the suspension and its clearance - 143 mm, and for the Korean competitor - 160 mm.
Technical comparison
Acceleration and top speed. It is difficult to take this parameter into account when choosing a car, since the dynamic component is approximately identical, and the values \u200b\u200bare extremely close. So for a manual transmission, the comparison between Skoda and Kia is 10.6 and 10.3, if we take into account the automatic transmission, the gap is also minimal, 11.9 and 11.2. Maximum developed speed - both cars confidently keep at a speed of 190 km / h. The engine capacity of both cars is the same - 1.6 liters. Thus, both vehicles are fast enough, dynamic and perfect for the city, but a small plus is still in favor of Skoda.
Fuel consumption. Cars in this regard are almost the same, so you can compare as follows:
As you can see from the table, approximately gasoline is consumed in the same way, but slightly lower consumption is observed in Kia, although both cars can be called economical.
Fuel tank volume. The difference in capacity is significant, especially for long journeys. The Skoda has a 55-liter tank, the Kia stint a little and installed it at only 43 liters.
Transmission. The choice should be made individually, since there are various gearbox models depending on the configuration, but the variety of choice is definitely greater with the Kia Rio. The technology used in Kia emphasizes the reliability of the hydromechanical device, which is much better than that of the "European", which works on the basis of the DSG robot, which has earned a bad reputation in the world. So the Kia car is sold in five and six-speed versions of the mechanical type, the automatic comes in four and six-speed models. Skoda has a slightly more meager choice, where there is only a five-speed manual transmission and a six-speed automatic.
Power
The advantage in this section should be given to Kia, which is 18 horsepower ahead of its rival. So Skoda has 105 hp, to which Kia responds with 128 hp.
Running characteristic
Superiority is unambiguous for the Korean version, since it is much more convenient to control, because the movements are smooth, it is not difficult to enter the turns at a calm pace. If a turn is made at an acute angle, it does not roll. Skoda, in turn, is much more straightforward; maneuverability may be somewhat lacking. Even the type of acceleration is different, Kia is characterized by smoothness, regularity, some linearity, which is more reliable than Skoda. Skoda, on the contrary, accelerates sharply, abruptly, which gives the impression of aggressiveness.
Test Drive
Of course, it is impossible to determine the Skoda Rapid or Kia Rio which is better without identifying the behavior of cars in real operating conditions. After conducting a comparative test drive, additional features of the cars surfaced.
Good quality sound insulation for both variants of the car, there is no significant consumption in quality indicators. Nevertheless, conducting a dialogue in calm tones may not work out. It was already stipulated that the power of the Kia is higher, but in real conditions this did not become noticeable, the acceleration was carried out in approximately equal time, although the behavior is different. The Korean has a pleasant, light gas pedal, in the presence of an automatic transmission, the selection of the necessary gear is made faster. Tests have shown that Skoda needs to put more pressure on the accelerator to maximize speed. The operation of the automatic transmission on the European is somewhat worse, since a decrease in speed leads to a slight delay when changing gears, they are eliminated in sports mode.
The Kia Rio is a little more difficult to steer on a smoother trajectory, as it is difficult to determine a clear zero from which the steering angle starts. So the Korean car somewhat limits the unity with the driver, you will have to feel some discomfort, perhaps almost imperceptible.
Conclusion
Kia wins in terms of equipment, but Skoda is better suited as a family car with more capacity. However, a significant plus in the direction of the "Korean", since the cost is less, in times of crisis, people give preference to this factor. What to choose, preferences in terms of design, price, functionality, power, etc. should be determined independently, since both options are worthy competitors.
Video comparison Rapid with Rio
Rapid, is he worth his money?
Vorotnikov is very detailed about Rapid
And now Votonikov's opinion about Rio
Bigger test drive tells about Kia Rio
Kia offers cars for every taste and color. The buyer can choose an SUV, minivan, sedan, hatchback. But there is a car that has become a real favorite among motorists in Russia and the CIS countries. It's about Kia Rio. The car is not deprived of an attractive design, inside it is quite comfortable, and its technical characteristics are enough for quiet operation in the city and on the high-speed highway. Today, Russian motorists are offered two versions of the body: a hatchback and a sedan. Both performances undoubtedly deserve attention.
But competing cars are no less interesting, among which the Skoda Fabia stands out. A comparative review will tell you about the technical characteristics of these cars, about their design, interior and, of course, prices. Prices are for February 2015, so they may not be consistent in the future.
Technical part
The main dimensions of the vehicles:
Regardless of the body type of the Kia Rio, the car can be equipped with one of the petrol units with a working volume of 1.4 or 1.6 liters. The power of the younger is 107 horsepower, the flagship is 123 power. If the line of motors is not very diverse, then there are many transmissions for the car: 5- or 6-speed mechanics, 4- or 6-speed mechanics. The power plants for the hatch and the sedan are the same, but the dynamic performance is different, depending on the body type.
The sedan accelerates to 100 km / h from 10.3 to 13.5 seconds, depending on the build. The maximum speed can be from 175 to 190 km / h. The car is famous for its fuel economy, in the combined cycle - from 5.8 to 6.5 liters per 100 kilometers. The dynamic characteristics of the Kia Rio hatchback are less by a minimum number of points, while the fuel consumption figures are identical. The maximum speed can be from 168 to 188 km / h. It accelerates to hundreds of kilometers from 10.4 to 13.6 seconds.
Skoda Fabia also comes in two versions - a sedan and a hatch, but now only hatchback versions are supplied to Russia. The line of units for the Skoda Fabia is more extended when compared with the Kia Rio: 1.2; 1.4 and 1.6 liters. The power ratings are in the same order - 70, 86, 105 and 180 horsepower. There are three gearboxes available - 5-speed manual, automatic in 6 and 7 steps. In terms of fuel consumption, the Skoda Fabia is not inferior to the Kia Rio in economy in all modes, in mixed engines they consume about 6.5 liters.
But the dynamic performance in this car is less, although the top engine has an order of magnitude more power. The speedometer needle moves from "0 km / h" to "100 km / h" in 11.5-14.9 seconds, depending on the selected engine and gearbox. The maximum speed of the Skoda Fabia is from 163 to 185 km / h. In terms of dynamics, the Skoda Fabia is inferior to the Kia Rio, but for budget cars this almost does not matter.
Driving performance
Despite the fact that the suspension of the Kia Rio has been optimized for use in Russian conditions, the Skoda Fabia demonstrates a softer and more comfortable ride on a poor-quality road. On good roads, the performance of these cars does not differ: Skoda Fabia and Rio drive smoothly, calmly, behave clearly when cornering - you can feel drifts only at high speed, to which these cars are rarely accelerated. Although the speed limit is high, for the motors of these state employees to break through the threshold of 120 km / h is a real test, which entails accelerated wear of the motor and its systems.
The Kia Rio boasts a high level of sound insulation. Judging by the reviews of people who have dealt with both cars, Fabia has less protection against noise, but this is felt only on poor-quality road surfaces, when stones are constantly flying from under the wheels. Cars are equipped with disc brakes, and the geometry of the body reduces the braking distance.
Exterior and interior of cars
It is impossible to say anything specific about the body design, the Kia Rio has a rather classic design, while the Skoda Fabia boasts original shapes that distinguish it from other hatchbacks. There are much more changes inside cars. Skoda Fabia is offered as a business class, respectively, and the level of comfort in this car is higher. This includes the presence in the basic configuration of heating, electronic drives for side windows. The driver can adjust his seat to a specific height, and the steering wheel to reach and height.
Kia Rio in the basic configuration cannot boast of such an abundance of settings, but its price is also much lower, but the figures are a little later. Nevertheless, it is quite pleasant to be in the Rio's cabin: the color scheme looks calm and does not get bored over time, the quality of the plastic is high enough, the buttons and switches on the dashboard are conveniently and clearly located. The luggage compartment of the Kia Rio is more - 370 liters versus 315 liters in the Skoda Fabia.
The air conditioner is present in Fabia in the base assembly, in Kia - in the base original. We say "original" because in front of it is an economical version without air conditioning, which has been on sale relatively recently. Prior to that, the Kia Rio also had an air conditioner in the base. Both cars have simple audio systems, standard multimedia setup. The equipment level in Fabia is higher, as is the cost. Kia Rio also gives comfort and safety (the basic version has ABS and airbags), but does not have such a rich equipment.
Prices and configuration
The basic version of the Skoda Fabia with the youngest engine and mechanics will cost about 420 thousand rubles, for the top-end configuration the motorist will give 820 000 rubles. Although the Skoda Fabia has an unusual appearance, it repels some buyers, but the Rio is simple, but at the same time its design attracts much more buyers. For the basic configuration of the Kia Rio, the buyer will now pay 450 thousand rubles - this is the version without air conditioning. The standard one will cost 500 thousand, more than 700 thousand will have to be paid for the Kia Rio with "full minced meat".
In general, the cars are similar in specifications, but the Rio has a more versatile design. Skoda Fabia can boast of modern and rich equipment, which the driver receives for little money.
