Skoda Yeti and Toyota RAY 4 comparison. Toyota RAV4 VS Skoda Yeti: Who is better suitable for the city? The overall impression of the car

On the highway, the car demonstrates passenger immediacy and harmonious. Outside the asphalt, good geometry and system dynamic stabilizationSoldering freely rotating wheels.

Even in the basic version of "Standard", Toyota RAV4 has a whole premium of electronic assistants. Also in the default options list Front and lateral airbags, security curtains, driver's knee airbag, air conditioning, heated front seats, audio system with MP3 / WMA support, 4 power windows, immobilizer, central locking from remote control, mesh and curtain for luggage compartment, fog, headlight washers. Want more for the same amount and with a "automatic" box? In this case, your choice: well-equipped compact SUV or a used full-sized crossover.

Way to lower class

Throw, on the verge of an outdoor, the power of the newest turbomobile 1.6, rich equipment - strong trumps Nissan Juke. The Torque Vectoring System allows you to share the torque between the rear wheels, throwing up to 50% of the entire thrust to the external wheel. On a light off-road, quite by the way, short skes Juke. But fully the clockwork nature of this car is manifested on a windows winding.

Max. Speed, km / h: 170

Acceleration 0-100 km / h, from: 10.8

From his closest relative, VW Tiguan, Skoda Yeti. Differs in smaller dimensions, original body design. Steering Informatively, and the reactions are accurate and predictable. Turbo engine 1.8 TSI is abolished elastic. The all-wheel drive version includes a number of electronic assistants facilitating the overcoming of Off-Road. The VARIOFLEX system allows you to fold or remove the three rear armchairs independently of each other.

Power, hp at rpm: 152 at 4500

Max. Speed, km / h: 196

Acceleration 0-100 km / h, from: 8.7

Fuel consumption, l / 100 km: city / highway / mix. Cycle 10.1 / 6.9 / 8.0

The native brother Suzuki SX4 has a balanced chassis, responsive steering wheel, clear switching "Mechanics". By the way, the 4x4 modification, justifying the name SEDICI (in Italian "sixteen"), is available exclusively with MCP and Motor 1.6. For the transfer of thrust back, an electronically controlled coupling that can operate in three modes is responsible. Firmly shot down suspension informs about the flaws of the roads. At speed, the picture spoil aerodynamic noises.

Power, hp at rpm: 107 at 5600

Max. Speed, km / h: 170

Acceleration 0-100 km / h, from: 10.8

Fuel consumption, l / 100 km: city / highway / mix. Cycle 8.9 / 6.1 / 7.1

Many consider three hours Grand Vitara. An approximate citizen is small dimensions, high landing, a decent visibility facilitate movement through the streets of the metropolis. The car enviable for most other parkets offers off-road potential. All-wheel drive transmission with the possibility of blocking the inter-axis differential and the inclusion of the downward transmission reinforces decent geometric permeability.

Power, hp at rpm: 169 at 6000

Max. Speed, km / h: 170

Acceleration 0-100 km / h, from: 11.5

Fuel consumption, l / 100 km: city / highway / mix. Cycle 11.9 / 8.0 / 9.4

Way to enhance class

According to the design of Santa Fe, the second generation is a typical crossover. But SANTA FE off-road bars are not ordered, since it has a convincing road lumen, successful geometry, the possibility of a hard connection rear wheels. In the car's assets, an derived ergonomics, a comfortable and cozy salon, however, the materials of the finishing places are budget. In the rear sofa, three adults will be comfortable comfortable.

Power, hp at rpm: 188 at 6000

Max. Speed, km / h: 190

Acceleration 0-100 km / h, from: 11.7

Fuel consumption, l / 100 km: city / highway / mix. cycle 15.1 / 8.8 / 11.2

Murano's sports imaging is emphasized quite harmonize with riding haggards. The car is almost without rolls progress, stably holds straight. But at low speeds there is a deficiency of the power intensity of the suspension. "Gallery" for the rarity hospitable, even threesome, the back of the rear sofa are regulated by inclination. Most cars on secondary market from gasoline engine V6 volume of 3.5 liters.

Power, hp at rpm: 234 at 6000

Max. Speed, km / h: 200

Acceleration 0-100 km / h, from: 8.9

Fuel consumption, l / 100 km: city / highway / mix. Cycle 17.2 / 9.5 / 12.3

Solid sizes - distinctive feature and one of the main advantages Chevrolet Captiva.. The crossover inspires respect for the cabin's cabin and luggage compartment, moreover, the par cleaner allows the installation of a third row of seats. Captiva rests on comfort, as a result, the rolls of rolls are too much, and the reactions to the rotation of the ram are slightly blurred. But on a straight line car comes with unshakable locomotive.

Power, hp at rpm: 230 at 6600

Max. Speed, km / h: 204

Acceleration 0-100 km / h, from: 8.8

Fuel consumption, l / 100 km: city / highway / mix. Cycle 16.2 / 8.7 / 11.5

Kia Sorento.

Kia Sorento. last generation Lost the frame and other off-road predecessor attributes, pouring into the ranks of large crossovers. In Plus, the PARKT, you can safely burn an expressive exterior, verified ergonomics, spacious salon, worthy level of equipment. Suspension is not called soft, the chassis on a pair with a rather sharp power allows you to enjoy driving. Excellent rating deserves "Automatic".

A few days ago my advice turned to me good friend. The essence of the question is as follows: it is required small crossoverwhich will be equally well to feel both in the city and on the broken rustic calaes. From the entire market manifold, he stopped at Toyota Rav4 and Skoda Yeti. It seemed that it could be more stupid than to compare these cars. After all, in fact they are in different classes. But if such a task is made, we will try to honestly compare two crossovers and find out how the next few years have to go to my comrade.

External dimensions

Before talking about the behavior of cars on the road, comfort in the cabin and other things, we might on "paper" data. Let's start by S. overall dimensions. RAV4 stretched to a length of 4570 mm, in width - 1845 mm, and in height - by 1670 mm. Wherein wheelbase is 2660 mm, and ground clearance - 197 mm. Yeti has the following dimensions: length - 4222 mm, width - 1793 mm, height - 1691 mm. The size of the wheelbase is 2578 mm. Clearance - 180 mm. Now we clearly see that cars actually belong to different categories. But even considering this, Yeti has a greater height. And taking into account a smaller landing over the road, we get a highly smaller volume of the cabin. The cutting mass of the crossover from Toyota is equal to 1540-1735 kg depending on the execution. Skoda is much easier - 1320-1560 kg depending on the version.



When it comes to urban exploitation, convenience comes to the fore. And you agree, parking and maneuver in traffic jams on compact car much more convenient. That is why Skoda gets the first score and opens an account in a duel with a larger RAV4. Account 1: 0 in favor of the baby Yeti.

Trunk.

Toyota trunk accommodates 506 liters when raised rear seats. The rear sofa folds in the classic proportion of 60/40 and forms a practically smooth surface with a trunk floor. Skoda rear compartment is noticeably more modest and accommodates only 322 liters. But then each of the three rear seats can be folded independently of each other. True, such a flat floor, as in RAV4, you will not get. According to the abundance of various locks, compartments and curtains, the trunk of both cars are about the same. Also, every car can be equipped with a mass of additional luggage accessories, such as grids, drawers and much more.



Since my comrade often has to transport cargo in the car, a large trunk is more priority for it. Total 1: 1 and Toyota compares the account in today's match. Go ahead.

Motor gamma and transmission

Despite the fact that my companion lives in a private house and accessible ways to his dwelling are far from being perfect, he stopped his choice on a monoloded transmission, as more economical when driving and cheaper in service. Both cars are offered both with front and complete drive.

The RAV4 in the mono-drive version can be obtained only with a 2-liter motor, which issues 146 forces and 187 nm of torque. It works both in a bundle with 6-speed mechanics and with a stepless variator. Gasoline consumes exclusively 95th and higher. On the go, the car with such an engine and the variator showed itself well. According to the RAV4 passport, this version is gaining the first hundred for 11.1 seconds, with mechanics - in 10.2 seconds. If there is a need to overtake, the crossover from Toyota will cope with the task once or two. The motor itself works elastically, the moment enough is almost everywhere. Grieved the slow reaction of the machine to press the gas pedal, which, however, is characteristic of many automatic transmission. As for the average fuel consumption, the version on the "mechanics" shows 7.7 liters per hundred, and the variator is 7.4 liters.

Now about Yeti. If you want to front-wheel driveYou can already choose from two options: either an atmospheric 1.6-liter motor with a return of 110 hp and 155 Nm of the moment, or a 1.4-liter turbocharge unit, which can already boast 122 forces and 200 nm of the moment. The atmospheric is combined both with a 5-speed "mechanics" and with a 6-speed "automatic". The turbo engine works in a pair only with 7-speed box dsg. With two clutches. As for the dynamics, both engines confidently show themselves both in the city and in the country track. Of course, 1.4 TSI is much more fun in communication. But if you appreciate a calm and cost-effective ride, then 1,6 MPI with more than will cover your requests. If you return to numbers, then 1.6 on the mechanics is gaining 100 km / h in 11.8 seconds (with a machine gun - 13.3 seconds). 1.4 TSI is more advantageous and accelerates the crossover to the first hundred for 10.6 seconds. As for fuel economy, a more modest motor consumes 6.9 liters per hundred, and the turbo version is 6.6 liters.

Thanks to the greater possibility of choosing and better efficiency with similar dynamic skoda characteristics Yeti again captures leadership in the race. 2: 1 in favor of the crossover from the Czech Republic.

Equipment and additional options

Compare the basic and maximum equipment of both cars, as well as look at the presence of additional options.









So, RAV4 already in the database has a LED daytime running lights and fog, heating windshield and front seats, full electric car, electric power steering, full arsenal airbag and electronic helpers. Plus 17-inch wheels on steel discs with caps, side mirrors Rear view with heating and electric drive, air conditioning, tissue upholstery of seats and audio training. The top version is expanded due to xenon headlights, 17-inch disks made of light alloy, roof rails, multifunctional steering, rear view camera, salon mirror rear view with electrochromic coating, climate control, cruise control, rain sensor, light sensor, parking sensors, leather inserts on the front panel, grid in the trunk and multimedia system With a 6.1-inch TFT-screen. As well as a system of help when descent on the slope.







Now Yeti. Basic equipment includes roof rails, heat shouting, 12V socket in trunk, 2 airbags, aBS systems and ESP, electric power steering, front electric windows, heated mirrors, heated windshield washer nozzles, audio preparation and 16-inch steel discs with caps. The luxury version is supplemented with rear lED lanterns, backrest table rear seat, leather steering, grid in the trunk, additional discharge in the cabin, side airbags, various control systems, a 2-dinner audio system with 8 speakers and micro-inch discs.

Both cars have an impressive list. additional equipmentwhich allows you to make crossovers more individual and comfortable.

Anyway, Toyota RAV4 has much more rich basic equipment. For this reason, the point is awarded to him, and the total meeting of the meeting becomes 2: 2.

Price

How much is this pleasure? The price of basic RAV4 excluding stocks and discounts starts from a mark of 1,225,000 rubles. It is so many dealers asking for a front-wheel drive car on the "handle". The top version with the variator will rise already at 1,510,000 rubles.

And how much now Yeti? Standard execution will cost you 935,000 rubles (1,6 MPI on "Mechanics"). The maximum cost of the SKODA monol drive crossover is 1,164,000 rubles.

The difference is obvious. Of course, Toyota has a more generous equipment, but the difference in 300,000 rubles brings Skoda another point in the piggy bank. Total 3: 2 in favor of the Czech crossover.

The overall impression of the car

And now the perpetrator itself will share his impressions from both cars and put a bold point in our comparison today. Please love and complain - Marat, entrepreneur, as well as my good friend.

Marat: "Toyota Rav4 pleased with a good visibility, thanks to which you feel comfortable on the road. The landing behind the wheel is comfortable: the seats are well held by the back, and the armrest is exactly where to him. The instrument readings are perfectly read. The car itself is felt much easier than it really is. It can be seen that the creators took care that even the most considerable driver did not experience inconvenience behind the wheel. Probably, therefore, the steering wheel is too thin and easy, because of what I lacked informativeness from leading wheels. The brakes are very sensitive, but the helpers system work smoothly and delicately. Gas pedal is a little tight, but thanks to this you can safely hold it in the same position. On the move Rav4 smooth, on asphalt rides confidently and predictably. It is felt that the suspension is pressed, but at the same time small irregularities work out perfectly.

Skoda Yeti has a chic steering wheel, for which it is very pleasant to stay. And also no less pleasant handle of the gearbox, thanks to which to change the transfer is a pleasure. But the landing behind the wheel I liked less than RAV4. Maybe because it did not give due attention to setting the seat under it. I think this is a corrected question. At the go of Skoda, at least not inferior to Toyota in the smoothness of the course, and the 1.4 TSI motor allows even to lose weight if desired.

Given everything that is written above about both cars, I think I will stop my choice on Yeti. Although RAV4 fully justifies the title of one of the leaders of its segment. "

"Yesterday five were very big. And today three, but small. " Now imagine the experience of the hero of the famous miniature Mikhail Zhvanetsky about cancers, if "big" and "small" cost the same. Our case! New Nissan. Qashqai and updated Kia Sportage. more compact than Mazdacx-5 and Toyota RAV4 - the difference in length is from 10 to 19 cm. And the "small" Skoda Yeti is shorter than four decimeters. But the initial prices for all-wheel drive versions of all five crossovers with gasoline engines With a capacity of about 150 hp Almost the same. Is that smaller, will be equipped with a cooler. However, the key question is the same as in the case of cancers. What are better: those that today, or those yesterday?

Than more car, the more spacious? Yes, but ... On the one hand, Toyota in this quintet is out of competition: you sit behind both in the business class. You can also build up, after throwing back the back of the sofa, you can throw the leg to the leg. The remaining four is closer. But thanks vertical landing SAMI compact Skoda. On request, the passengers are not worse for passengers than Mazda, Nissan and Kia, - a person in 176 cm at the same driver in front of his knees of more than ten centimeters!

Moreover, if it is convenient to sit in CX-5 and Yeti, then Qashqai and Sportage as they conspired - they offer a low landing for a grasshopper, with sked knees.


New Qashqai. - as a dietary hamburger: looks appetizing, but the taste is unplant

0 / 0

And trunk? We measured their volumes with the help of "tarled" balls, and ... here is already a connection with the length of the body. Direct: Skoda holds only 343 "ball" liters and can be compared with Nissan (404 L) and KIA (413 L) only if Move forward or dismantle the three rear twin seats at all. By the way, only Yeti has such an opportunity, as well as an optional folding front seat.


"Fat!" - The highest praise Casca from aggressive-progressive youth. Fancy composition of militant plastic, glossy decor and "fittings" of New Teana looks rich

But even damaging the freedom of passengers and receiving the coveted 447 liters under the curtain, in Skoda still do not download so much Skarba, how many P-scratch Mazda (540 L) or Toyota (537l). Moreover, RAV4 has an optional electric device with a fifth door, and the loading height is substantially less. From the spring of this year, Russian "rafiki" are completed with the region: the floor of the trunk fell, there is no longer a porbit full of full sparkle.