If you have the desire to purchase a crossover, almost every car enthusiast is faced with the choice between the two most popular machines: Mazda CX-5 and Nissan Qashqai.. These models are occupied leadership positions in the automotive market. To compare Mazda CX5 and Nissan Cascai, you need to learn in detail about each of them: the advantages, similarities and fundamental differences.
Exterior car
What a car looks like is important for everyone. During the walk, first draws attention to the appearance of the car, and then on the brand. Therefore, it is worth learn what is better - Nissan Casca or Mazda CX5 - according to outdoor parameters.
Externally, the release and Mazda CX 5 is similar. Design one and other talks about power. In the case of Nissan, the opinion is deceptive. It looks elegant, and Mazda will assert. The effect is achieved due to the massive ventilation grille in the front of the car and straight line above the door handles.
The appearance of the Mazda CX-5 embodies the manufacturer's concept called Kodo (translated "Driving soul").
In the issue of exterior, it is impossible to declare exactly what is better - Mazda or Nissan. If you like the classic car style, give preference to Nissan Qashqai. If you wish to have more sporting car, Choose CX-5.
Characteristic
- both diesel cars with a box of automatic;
- fuel consumption is the same, approximately 7.5 l / 100 km;
- 1997 cc.
- in all other parameters, Mazda CX-5 wins;
- power Mazda Cx5 150 hp, at Qashqai 144 hp;
- the time of acceleration - 8.9 s, in Cascais - for a whole second longer (9.9 seconds);
- maZDA 215 mm clearance, Nissan 190 mm;
- CX-5 all-wheel drive, and dry front-wheel drive;
- The advantages of Nissan include the volume of the trunk (430 liters). CX-5 is 403 liters. But Mazda CX-5 has a more spacious salon.
With confidence you can say that Mazda is more powerful and better. Power gives a greater number of cylinders (4 of them, Nissan Cascais - 2). Thanks to them, the jeep accelerates to 200 km / h, which is maximum speed For this model. Nissan, this indicator is 170 km / h.
The feature of Cascais - light bulbs near the front mirrors, which light up if the car is overtaken as well a roof with a panoramic view from glass. The uniqueness of Mazda is the saving fuel system I-STOP. It is useful, for example, during the waiting for the green light of the traffic light.
In the safety plan, both cars deserve the highest praise. They have more than 6 pillows, ABS, Brake Assist, stabilization of ESP stability, start-up system on the rise of us, anti-slip ASR and much more.
Given the listed characteristics, it is worth noting that both models have a number of advantages. When choosing an CC5 or Casca, it is necessary to decide for which particular purpose the crossover is needed. Mazda CX-5 will suit lovers to drive off off-road. Nissan Qashqai is designed for a relaxed ride in the city along a well-asphalt road.
What machine to give preference
The difference in the price of two crossovers is $ 2,000. Mazda CX-5 is more expensive. If we compare both cars, then the advantage of Mazda above Nissan is clearly traced. She is:
- spacious;
- more powerful;
- it has a good dynamics;
- designed to drive in the city;
- suitable for off-road races.
Given these parameters, the question "What - Nissan Qashqai or Mazda CX-5" does not occur.
These cars belong to the crossovers segment and are a popular solution among many motorists. The crossover is a peculiar intermediate link between massive SUV class SUVs and compact passenger cars.
The main advantages of such cars are considered to be the fact that they allow us to expand their circle of potential targeted use. Crossovers are quite successfully coping with not only with asphalted coating of average quality, but also allow the owner to exit on the lung off-road.
By comfort and manageability, crossovers are not inferior lucky carsAnd according to the technological components and the indicators of the patency have many common with full-fledged SUVs.
The objects of our comparison today will be the crossover Mazda CX-5, which was submitted in 2011, and the popular Nissan Qashqai 2013. Versions of models have diesel and petrol engines, PPC are represented by a machine and mechanical transmission.
The most popular options for crossovers from Nissan and Mazda are a complete set, equipped with diesel engine and automatic transmission. They will be the subject of our further comparison.
Mazda CX-5
The crossover model from the Japanese Mazda Corporation turned out to be coordinated and completed. The car completely embodied the newest philosophical concept of the company, which was named Kodo, which literally means "moving soul".
To the main trait appearance Models include the presence of muscular wheeled arches, which are made in the form of smooth lines that do not have sharp folds or angles. The side of the Mazda CX-5 looks noticeably stricter, in the upper third of the body, in the area above the outer door handles, a strict straight line can be traced. This gives the profile the type of rapidness and energetic, and the arches focus on the aerodynamic component. However, for compliance with the overall picture, the lower part of the doors has a slightly rounded line, which complements harmony. This goal is also a drop-down roof, hinting for excellent body streaming by air flows when driving.
Narrow head optics and a large stylized radiator grille, in shape resembling shield, are able to make a note of seriousness and deliverance to the general type of crossover. The personal part cannot be called extremely aggressive, but also not expressly expressed friendly features.
The back, traditionally for Mazda, is made in a sporty style. A massive two-component bumper is distinguished by a terrain of strict lines in its lower part, which is made of black unpainted plastic. The top of the details fully complements the overall body concept. Sustainment give the narrowed rear stop headlights and chrome pipes on pipes exhaust system. The spoiler on the 5th body door finally fixes the feeling of speed and power.
Nissan Qashqai.
This model of the Japanese brand car enthusiasts have known for a long time. In the whole history of its existence, the Nissan Qashqai crossover was not upgraded more than once.
The crossover was originally created in Europe, having a pronounced orientation to European markets. Qashqai represents a successful combination of a variety of design and designer solutions. The front of the crossover turned out rather strict and well recognizable.
Special attention deserves the head optics, on which designers are placed significant load on creating overall impression From the appearance of the machine. Diode running lightsDesigned to use the day, received the form of the recognizable "boomeranga", high quality raising the visual impression of the front of the crossover to a new level.
The hood lines give the general appearance of elegance and produce a strong impression, forcing unwittingly to expect a lot of powerful power characteristics from a car, although it is not so.
The lateral profile of the model is quite standard, following the most modern trends of the world car industry. Having drops down to the rear side of the roof with rails, and a straight line, stamped in the center of the door along the entire body: such solutions can be found often.
Separately, it is worth mentioning the back optics of Nissan Qashqai. This element of the exterior is designed to separate the model from other Nostlators in the Nissan row. The main feature of the solution is that the headlights are significantly enveloped by the body of the car, invading the rear part into the lateral profile space of the wings, giving the stern volume.
Looking at both cars, it is impossible to unconditionally handing the palm of the championship one of them. Each model turned out to be very elegant, stylish and separate. Crossovers from Nissan and Mazda are designed for the widest audience of buyers. Design used carefully verified and balanced modern solutionsThanks to which standard platforms received their expressiveness and individuality. At the same time, the classical traditions of modern automotive and body design are preserved to the fullest. However, putting both cars nearby, the Mazda CX-5 is still on the floor ahead. The overall concept of the car is better traced in this model. The balance between the exterior of the front, side and rear part is more harmoniously designed and decorated than Nissan Qashqai.
Salon
Nissan Qashqai.
Interior details Nissan Qashqai immediately attract their views. The front part of the torpedo was soft almost all over the entire area, which was a wonderful decision. During operation, you should not expect the appearance of extraneous noise, fitting elements, like the materials themselves, is impressive. In the overall layout of the interior, something from the premium Nissanovsky Infiniti is guessed, many details received peculiar roundings, creating a sense of integrity and unity with space for the driver and its passengers.
There are several options for finishing chairs and ceiling. It can be like a tissue seat upholstery and skin use.
Seat profile Made in the best European traditions, the pillows are moderately rigid, well hold the saddle. Side support is developed at a sufficient level, and the back in the upper and lower part does not tend to get tired after long trip. The driver's seat has a wide range of adjustment in various planes. The rear sofa is spacious, the profile is good. Door cards, traditionally for price orientation, are made of solid plastic.
Armrest Its at the heart of a deep niche, in which you can place the bottled containers. Such a solution has become affordable due to the fact that constructively classical layout parking brake absent, freeing the space.
Central Console and dashboard Completed in classic style, no solutions that deviate from the standard were noticed. All attention is focused on a multimedia system, which can be as a sensory solution in medium-sized equipment and a conventional audio system in the initial versions technical Equipment car. The next element becomes information display climatic Installation. Here, too, everything is quite standard. Between the instrument pads place the screen on-board computer. It is colored, with a 5-inch working diagonal.
Backlight devices and the functional elements are made in a soft blue glow, which is combined with a white and orange tone, rather resembling amber tint. All readings are fairly easily read under any light conditions, significantly improving the comfort and level of interaction with the devices and crossover systems. By the way, the amber backlight is equipped with an area around the handle of the PPC.
Noise insulation is at the level above average, which is amazing for japanese car. This characterizes the model as directed to the markets of Europe, where acoustic comfort is an important component. Improving this factor contributed to the fact that the overall sound of acoustics has changed. You can trace a bass note of medium depth, and the sound attack in the cabin is clear and pronounced.
Adjustment of the steering column allow you to set up departure and height. It will be possible to get a convenience with convenience. Steering wheel traditionally for modern caris a multifunctional element. The control is implemented quite conveniently, the size of the steering buttons is sufficient, the material of their manufacture is pleasant and does not slide under the fingers, the press occur gently and smoothly.
Claims for ergonomics The inner space does not occur. All buttons, adjustment and control elements, functional niches and compartments are located quite conveniently. A thorough work of the team of designers and engineers, who thoroughly thought out every functional solution regarding ergonomics and the convenience of staying in the car's cabin.
Mazda CX-5
The interior of Mazda CX-5 promises a lot. The first impression is positive. All parts are high-quality, without sharp corners. It is possible to observe a certain tendency of designers to rounding the forms, of which the inner component of the crossover consists.
Front console Made of soft plastic. It looks expensive and solid. Fitting details at the highest level, all the elements are monolithically and comprehensively set up in their places. There is a certain strength of the construction that eliminates the appearance outsided sounds when driving, especially by road covering low quality. Multimedia The system ranked a major role in the central part. They placed the screen so that it is slightly deepened inside. It is very convenient, since the "visor" formed from above excludes litters and glare. Under the screen turned out the shelf. The system optionally may have a navigation function.
Backlight the devices are implemented in white, by shade it resembles the lunar. Climate window highlighted reddish-orange what is characteristic solution In the traditional style of Mazda.
Sitting The car has ample opportunities for setting up the lower pillow and the upper back in different planes. They are made of good fabric, which causes pleasant sensations when touched. An option is also possible to finish the seats of the skin or in the form of a combination of fabric and leather.
Qualitatively and comfortably will be able to accommodate the driver of any complexation and almost any growth. The lower pillow is very comfortable, the whole femur is as if resting. The back of the front armchairs has an excellent profile, side support reliably keeps the back, eliminating excessive bias in shorts.
Armrest Mazda is comfortable, it provides a reliable support. In length, this element is quite enough, the hand does not hang. But the functional niche is not very deep, the overall containers with drinks are already more complicated.
Quality noise insulation Mazda CX-5 is at a sufficient and acceptable level. Noise from small pebbles and sandblasting wheeled arches slightly distinguish in motion, but from other extraneous sounds outside inner space It is not bad. The rocker of the engine begins to bother only outside the average revolutions.
Multifunctional steering wheel This model comfortably falls into the hand. Steering column Allows you to set up departure and height. In a pair with seat adjustments, get comfortable on driver's seat It does not work out.
Ergonomics model Located at a very high level. All function keys and regulators in their places. It is enough just to reach almost all of the meaning elements of the control.
It is worth noting that the climate installation information window is quite small, it is not always convenient to read information, so this element will require some addiction.
With many similar features and qualitative indicators, interior Nissan. Qashqai in high grades looks more modern and technologically, than the solution from Mazda. It is worth considering the fact that Mazda CX-5 appeared earlier than the model from Nissan, and the question of time is very important for technological progress. If you compare the configuration close to the basic, then Mazda is not particularly inferior to a more modern competitor.
Challenges
Mazda CX-5
The crossover with a trap diesel heart is a dream for any of the motorists. This type DVS, paired with a well-tuned suspension, provides Mazda CX-5 wonderful characteristics and indicators when driving. Even at those speeds that are far away permitted, the car behaves confidently. The suspension is knocked down and elastic, on serious obstacles and potholes work although it does not quite imply and gently, but it does not reach breakdown or unpleasant sounds. Comfortably feel both front and rear passengers. Clearance allows you to attack low borders and minor pits.
The steering wheel is sharp, the car obediently and predictably reacts to the slightest swing steering wheel. Large number of electronic systems active security Make riding in Mazda reliable, calm and comfortable. The only observation is the lack of proper reactive effort on the steering wheel when the speed set. Informativeness is slightly lost, but it is not a problem, rather, it's just a matter of habit.
No questions arise to the brake system, all the settings are predictable. Brakes at the car are just excellent.
Nissan Qashqai.
Power and torque, please notice, not the most bulk diesel engine, Nissan Qashqai is enough. Both in the city and on the highway, it is quite good to accelerate and maneuver.
But to the implementation of the features of the suspension there is a specific list of claims. The operation of all nodes of the chassis is clearly configured to comfort. The suspension is soft and quiet on small irregularities, but when the wheel hit the pit, deepened, a deaf knock appears. This is not a breakdown, but it is already close. It turns out a peculiar payback for comfort. With sharp maneuvers, small rolls are observed, which affects the sharpness of the handle and the overall handling. The crossover is clearly focused on urban calm ride, what his clearance says. Departure to light off-road implies rather as a necessary necessity than a specific goal.
In the track mode, active electronic helpers, though trying to improve the situation by holding the car on a given trajectory, but the feeling that the car roll does not leave you when driving on a bit of high speeds.
Bashes the crossover confidently, here the nuances have not been revealed. Setting brake systems at a high level.
Both vehicles show excellent, for their class, speaker indicators and provide comfortable and reliable ride. Mazda is a bit breaking forward, ahead of Nissan on handling and power characteristics. Qashqai is a more preferred option for comfort and non-density in the conditions of the city. If you intend to exploit a crossover for high-speed runs along the tracks, you plan to leave a light off-road, then it is worth paying the model CX-5 more attention.
Capacity
Both models are almost equal in their dimensional characteristics. A little large wheelbase Mazda CX-5 allows you to win a slight supply of free space. In both models, there is enough space in height and width on the front row. The rear row allows you to comfortably accommodate two adult passengers, you have been closed three times. Places for legs for the rear row.
It is worth considering the fact that on the passenger front place And in the back row, space above your head can be little to people whose growth is at a mark of 190 cm. and above. Fault constructive feature Falling roof like Mazda and Nissan.
The Mazda CX-5 trunk allows you to get 443 liters of useful volume. Rear seats Earn easily, opening access to the almost smooth floor of 1.7 meters of length and the maximum 1560 liters, which is an impressive indicator.
The Nissan Qashqai trunk is able to provide a volume of 430 liters. After folding the rear row, we get 1585 liters, respectively.
Fuel consumption
The fuel efficiency of crossovers is at a high level, when taking into account that both cars have excellent dynamic characteristics. It is particularly surprising a crossover from Mazda, which is distinguished by an outstanding power with a rather low intake of diesel fuel.
Safety
Mazda CX-5 and Nissan Qashqai crossovers have a rich set of active and passive security systems. The list is: ABS, Stabilization of ESP Stability, Anti-Sacking ASR, Start Assistance System on HAC Lifting, System emergency braking BRAKE ASIST and many others. In the database, cars received airbag from 6-airbags. Both crossovers have 5 stars out of 5 times, according to the results of the EURO NCAP laboratory tests.
She probably became the most important premiere of autumn - and, it seems that the most controversial. Changes in design and technique turned out to be close to revolutionary and almost no one leave indifferent. I am sure that there are quite a few people who will be better talking about new technique Mazda, but in the discussion of the design, I would like to throw my five kopecks. My name is Nikolai Pronin, I am engaged in an industrial design, sketching design and graphics, and in parallel I lead a blog in which I am trying to analyze the design most interesting cars. The new "treshka" of me, of course, hooked. Mazda says that the car has become the development of the Kodo design philosophy, the essence of which is clean and minimalism. But is it simple, this Mazda 3, as it seems at first glance? Let's try to figure out.
In this note, I will concentrate on appetizer, leaving the interior behind the brackets, because there are a lot of tactile sensations that cannot be understood without contact with the machine. Exterior It is not difficult to estimate and at a distance.
So, Mazda 3 is represented at once with two types of body - hatchback and sedan. And despite the fact that they are very similar, interchangeable body elements, in addition to headlights and the hood, I could not find it. That is, it's so obvious with the back, but at first it seems the same, but if you look at, then the bumper, and the grill of the radiator, and the front doors of the hatch with the sedan are individual. Pay attention to the difference in the upper part of the front door frame: the sedan is acute, almost triangular, because the four-door Mazda 3 for five millimeters above the hatchback.
Everything says that the front wings are also unidenticious. At hatchback immediately behind the wheel arch, the sidewall is stronger than "drawn" inside - in the language of designers it is called a negative surface. And this "dent" seeks to the bottom and up. By the way, because of this, even the length of the legs side mirror At the sedan and hatch are different.
The four-door body plastic is formed with clearer horizontal lines seeking to feed. Together with them, the bulbs of the sidewall are stretched in length, and the bending of the window frame on the rear rack on all canons of the correct proportions is exactly in the center of the rear wheel. Although the lifting line of the threshold, poorly docked with the bumper lines, it looks strange and illogical.
Hatch everything is different: he just breaks the rules. The window line does not reach the wheel hub - no element is attached to it at all. The entire form of surfaces is aimed at a little up, to the rear rack, emphasizing the attention of the viewer. And besides the lines of the threshold, the hood and windows, on its sidewall there is not a single rosary face. All body plastic is built on the game of light, shadows and reflections (reflexes). This is the design minimalism. And all the visible faces of the body are drawn reflections and are constantly in a state of superposition, that is, they exist and do not exist at the same time, depending on the direction of the viewer's view.
However, despite the fact that in the ways of implementing Kodo's design, two Mazda turned out to be very different, in their physique and technique they, of course, remain twins. The wheel base they have the same (2725 mm), and the proportions for each body type are ordinary front-wheel drive. In the database, three with a small wheels are placed, and if you consider strictly between the hubs, then even more than four complete diameters, it's a lot, therefore a positive perception of length is created. Front Svea in front-wheel drive is rather big - ¾ wheels, and the front rack of the roof does not fall into the center of the front wheel and "clings" the edge of the bumper. It is believed that the closer the imaginary line of the rack passes to the hub, the more status and rapid seems to be a car. However, it can be seen that Mazda did not imitate the rear-wheel drive proportions, instead of the sedan a long nose Balanced by the rear breath, which fits the full wheel, and the hatchback, on the contrary, the emphasis was made on the "Cabin" shifted forward.
I dare to assume that Mazda tried to give a five-year supercar proportion, because a long nose, a short tail and Cab Forward is almost a Lamborghini recipe. But I want to offer you an even more unexpected analogy. Take a look at VEYRON - after all, in his Mazda 3, the physique is like something. Array of deaf metal behind the door window and roof line falling from the very windshield. Do not find?
By the way, I think, many are wondering how the hatchback with such a massive rack will look at small base wheels? I am sure, the kind will turn out to be not very, but the trick is that Mazda has no small basic wheels. Indeed, in the published specifications for the American market, Mazda provided only two dimensions - 215/45 R18 (as on all corporate front photographs) and 205/60 R16 as a "base". I specifically replaced with a 18-inch 18-inch stamping wheels so that you would rate the difference. The result, of course, is not ahti, but it's not about the size, because such "sixteenth" wheels in their external diameter for one millimeter larger than 18-inch!
I want to once again focus on the most interesting, in my opinion, the designer of Kodo design. To understand his main chip, let's imagine the car without unnecessary tinsel like headlights, windows and other secondary elements. Let us leave only the volume.
Body built by intersections of transformed spherical volumes. The spheres are poured into each other, they are spliced, deducted. Thanks to the control of the "docking" of these surfaces, it turned out at first glance is simple, but in fact a very complex form.
And I also wondered how far Mazda in the serial car retreated from promises, 2017 data. The difference was not so significant to emphasize attention on it, but in the process of comparison I found another proof that the sedan and hatchback Mazda. 3 are two different cars in style. Just look at the concept car - we thought that a new Mazda 6 would grow out of it, but it turned out that many decisions were embodied already in the Mazda sedan 3. And the hatchback, yes, made from the concept of Kai.
And one more fishech, which may see only me. If you also watched the film "InterSellar", then surely remember the modulation of the black hole. So designers Mazda, in my opinion, managed to make her like on the sidewalls of the body. Due to the intricate conjugation of the surfaces, they built a real light trap, creating directed, controlled reflections. Finding on its borders, reflections begin to walk along a given trajectory, like matter, captured by the gravitation of a black hole, and having passed the "horizon of events" of the surface, the light can no longer get out of it.
But it is especially good that's noticeable, oddly enough, not on the "Troika", but on the concept of Mazda Vision Coupe. Thanks to the extremal form of surfaces and less rigid frames when building a concept, it is possible to estimate this phenomenon in full scale: here you and the colossal sizes accretion disk, drawn by the sidewall, and gravitational linlication created by the threshold, and a huge abyss near the wing and door connector. So I want to say: Mazda, you are just space. Agree?
Many automakers are extremely careful about the production of pseudo-alone cars in the mass segment. Exceptions can be counted on the fingers of the hands, and among them you will definitely see several models from Mazda.
As well as Honda Civic Passed on the market precisely under such not peculiar to many style. True, in contrast to "Civic", the third model of the Mazda is not distinguished by highly efficient motors, sports victories or racing technologies. On the contrary, under the hood "Trooks" stand very ordinary power units (we mean ordinary not in terms, but in terms of peak capacities), the suspension is not equipped with customizable shock absorbers, and inside their salons you will not find sports Rule. The exception is the version of "MPS", but it is so rare that its presence on the roads is very difficult to notice, and some vividly pronounced sports character do not differ these models, so averaged option among many.
Thus, Mazda3, though it does not seek to race, nevertheless carries DNA precisely sports car, compensating for the lack of forces under the hood by an excellent design, which does not have any other competitor in the segment.
No one except Mazda3
And indeed, what kind of competitor to choose it to be able to compare in beauty and grace with the model Mazda3? Volkswagen Golf., Opel Astra, PEUGEOT 308, Renault Megane, SEAT LEON, Kia Ceed or Hyundai i30? All these models are even reference in terms of practicality and mass, but these are definitely not competitors of Troika, especially when we are talking about recently debuting IV generation. Note that even the LEON model from the SEAT, which in its second generation looks very much, is unlikely to be able to draw attention to the fans of Mazda3:
SEAT LEON - a beautiful car, but not a competitor 2020 Mazda3
So it turns out that if you wish to take something "special", the choice is small: either sports civic, or beautiful, but care for in terms of technical characteristics Mazda3.
If you want the most beautiful sedan or C-segment hatchback, choose Mazda3 IV generation
In any case, if you are looking for a new sports hatchback C-segment, you probably better wait for the market new version Mazda3 2019. model year. Why? Yes, just take a look at it:
2019 Mazda3 - It is better not to find!
Kai concept car has become a present sensation of 2017. The new generation of Mazda3 produced no smaller four
And indeed, compared to the predecessor, the new Mazda3 looks much emotionally. Let's even more, in the fourth generation, the features of the European school prevail, especially well it can be seen from the rear angle ¾:
Nothing reminds? In our opinion, the "Japanese" is extremely similar to the same models ALFA ROMEO
The front of the new model is not actually very different from the concept applied in the previous generation, but all lines and body folds have become less noticeable, which results in a picture of the full update of the car, which simply blows freshness.
Again, discussing the stylistics, it is difficult not to succumb to emotions and compare two generations objectively, but when looking at both models from this angle it seems to us that restyling previous generation It looks more impressive (photo at the top -, below - the restyling of the third generation):
Don't you think that the previous version looked at sports?
The interior has improved including
What to say about the interior when comparing versions of two generations? The first thing that rushes into the eyes is minimalism. Salon of the new "Troika" became much easier by transferring many controls in a virtual cockpit. But at the same time, the interior has become more difficult. His "difficulty" is that in the cabin are used by much better finish materials, at least we are trying to convince us to convince the manufacturer itself. I hope these changes are in every way to feel as soon as the novelty will be on sale.
But visually changes are visible in the stretched "hanging" with an 8.8-inch LCD screen of an infotainment system, a new steering wheel, an elongated central armrest, new kapholders ("cuppools") and the gearbox lever, which "Includes a black laser-engraved layer covered with a second transparent layer"What creates the effect of glossy black decoration "Deep transparency". It, so to speak, more stylish version of black.
Of course, new items have multiple system assistance to the driver, such as Front Cross Traffic Alert or system Cruising & Traffic Supportwhere the first detects the approaching vehicles At the crossroads, and the latter can automatically speed up, brake and drive a car in various situations. But most of these auxiliary technologies, one way or another, was involved in the third generation Mazda3.
What about the sedan?
Yes, as usual, there are two versions of the new Mazda3, but only one of them has a unique design of the back, and this is definitely not a four-door model in a sedan body.
The new Mazda3 sedan, technically superior to his predecessor, does not really look amazing others. You would claim that Mazda really stands out in a crowd of similar models like VW Jetta, Ford Focus. Sedan, Renault Megane Sedan or Skoda Octavia.? We would say no! Moreover, even new sedan Corolla and it looks more profitable than the new third-series sedan. Alas, here, in our opinion, Mazda made misses.
